Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26899781›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2017

Transcription reactivation during the first meiotic prophase in bugs is not dependent on synapsis.

Alberto Viera, María Teresa Parra, Julio S Rufas, Jesús Page

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unusual RNA polymerase II patterns in meiotic prophase I inTurkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Meiotic chromosome dynamics and double strand break formation in reptiles.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetic Molecular Mechanisms in Insects.Neotropical entomology · 2020
    Review
  10. Meiosis in the scorpionBiology open · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto VieraDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, 28049, Spain.
María Teresa ParraDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, 28049, Spain.
Julio S RufasDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, 28049, Spain. julio.s.rufas@uam.es.
Jesús PageDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, 28049, Spain. jesus.page@uam.es.
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During meiosis, transcription is precisely regulated in relation to the process of chromosome synapsis. In mammals, transcription is very low until the completion of synapsis in early pachytene, and then reactivates during mid pachytene, up to the end of diplotene. Moreover, chromosomes or chromosomal regions that do not achieve synapsis undergo a specific process of inactivation called meiotic silencing of unpaired chromatin (MSUC). Sex chromosomes, which are mostly unsynapsed, present a special case of inactivation named meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI). Although processes that are similar to MSUC/MSCI have been described in other species like Sordaria and Caenorhabditis elegans, very few studies have been developed in insects. We present a study on the relationships between synapsis and transcription in two hemipteran species (Graphosoma italicum and Carpocoris fuscispinus) that possess holocentric chromosomes but develop different synaptic patterns. We have found that transcription, revealed by the presence of RNA polymerase II, is very low at the beginning of meiosis, but robustly increases during zygotene, long before the completion of synapsis, excepting in the sex chromosomes. In fact, we show that histone H3 methylation at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) may be present in the sex chromosomes at leptotene, thus acting as a likely epigenetic mark for this inactive state. Our results suggest that the meiotic transcription in these two species is differently regulated from that of mammals and, therefore, offer new opportunities to understand the relationship between synapsis and transcription and the mechanisms that govern MSUC/MSCI processes.

Indexed as

Chromosome PairingTranscriptional ActivationAnimalsHeteropteraMaleMeiosisMeiotic Prophase IRecombination, GeneticSpermatocytesMeiosisMSCIMSUCSynapsisTranscription

Identifiers

PMID26899781
OpenAlexW2332792845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.