ArticleThe Analyst2016
Microfluidic devices with templated regular macroporous structures for HIV viral capture.
Article in The Analyst, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidic sample preparation for respiratory virus detection: A review.Biomicrofluidics · 2021Review
- Advances in Continuous Microfluidics-Based Technologies for the Study of HIV Infection.Viruses · 2020Review
- Advanced "lab-on-a-chip" to detect viruses - Current challenges and future perspectives.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2020Review
- Micropatterned macroporous structures in microfluidic devices for viral separation from whole blood.The Analyst · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
There is a need to develop inexpensive, portable and easy-to-use devices for viral sample processing for resource-limited settings. Here we offer a solution to efficient virus capture by incorporating macroporous materials with regular structures into microfluidic devices for affinity chromatography. Two-dimensional simulations were first conducted to investigate the effects of two structures, a nanopost array and a spherical pore network, on nanoparticle capture. Then, the two structures were created in polymers by templating anodic aluminum oxide films and 3D close-packed silica particles, respectively. When the microdevices containing functionalized porous materials were tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) isolation, capture efficiencies of 80-99% were achieved under a continuous flow. Comparatively, functionalized flatbed microchannels captured around 10% of HIV particles. As the characteristic dimensions of the nanostructures are tunable, such devices can be adapted for the capture of different submicron bioparticles. The high capture efficiency and easy-to-operate nature suit the needs of resource-limited settings and may find applications in point-of-care diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.