Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26899353›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Graphene oxide-dependent growth and self-aggregation into a hydrogel complex of exoelectrogenic bacteria.

Naoko Yoshida, Yasushi Miyata, Kasumi Doi, Yuko Goto, Yuji Nagao, Ryugo Tero, Akira Hiraishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Polyphasic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Biocatalyst physiology and interplay: a protagonist of MFC operation.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Naoko YoshidaCenter for Fostering Young and Innovative Researchers, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8555, Japan.
Yasushi MiyataNagoya Municipal Industrial Research Institute, Nagoya, Aichi 456-0058, Japan.
Kasumi DoiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8555, Japan.
Yuko GotoElectronics-Inspired Interdisciplinary Research Institute (EIIRIS), Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Aichi 441-8580, Japan.
Yuji NagaoDepartment of Environmental and Life Sciences, Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Aichi 441-8580, Japan.
Ryugo TeroElectronics-Inspired Interdisciplinary Research Institute (EIIRIS), Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Aichi 441-8580, Japan.
Akira HiraishiElectronics-Inspired Interdisciplinary Research Institute (EIIRIS), Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Aichi 441-8580, Japan.
Toyohashi University of Technology · JPNagoya Institute of Technology · JPNagoya Municipal Industrial Research Institute · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) is reduced by certain exoelectrogenic bacteria, but its effects on bacterial growth and metabolism are a controversial issue. This study aimed to determine whether GO functions as the terminal electron acceptor to allow specific growth of and electricity production by exoelectrogenic bacteria. Cultivation of environmental samples with GO and acetate as the sole substrate could specifically enrich exoelectrogenic bacteria with Geobacter species predominating (51-68% of the total populations). Interestingly, bacteria in these cultures self-aggregated into a conductive hydrogel complex together with biologically reduced GO (rGO). A novel GO-respiring bacterium designated Geobacter sp. strain R4 was isolated from this hydrogel complex. This organism exhibited stable electricity production at >1000 μA/cm(3) (at 200 mV vs Ag/AgCl) for more than 60 d via rGO while temporary electricity production using graphite felt. The better electricity production depends upon the characteristics of rGO such as a large surface area for biofilm growth, greater capacitance, and smaller internal resistance. This is the first report to demonstrate GO-dependent growth of exoelectrogenic bacteria while forming a conductive hydrogel complex with rGO. The simple put-and-wait process leading to the formation of hydrogel complexes of rGO and exoelectrogens will enable wider applications of GO to bioelectrochemical systems.

Indexed as

BiofilmsBioelectric Energy SourcesElectric CapacitanceGeobacterGraphiteHydrogelsMolecular TypingOxidesPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SGraphiteHydrogelsOxidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26899353
PMCPMC4761877
OpenAlexW2463995257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.