Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26898856›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2016

Provision of social norm feedback to high prescribers of antibiotics in general practice: a pragmatic national randomised controlled trial.

Michael Hallsworth, Tim Chadborn, Anna Sallis, Michael Sanders, Daniel Berry, Felix Greaves, Lara Clements, Sally C Davies

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 193 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03776383 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Ontario Healthcare Implementation Laboratory: A Learning Health System Approach That Leverages Data to Improve Quality in Primary Care: Stage 1

TypeinterventionalSponsorOntario Agency for Health Protection and PromotionRan2018 to 2020Enrolled3,500ConditionsAntibiotic Prescribing Audit and FeedbackArmsAntibiotic use feedback letter
NCT07112508 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

PRISM: The PRimary Care Individual Social Norms MSK Data Dashboard: a Cluster Randomised Feasibility Trial in Clinician Management of Musculoskeletal Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2026 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsMusculoskeletal DisordersArmsPRISM dashboard is a data report, THe usual care intervention is a first contact physiotherapy service.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Audit and Feedback Interventions for Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael HallsworthBehavioural Insights Team, London, UK; Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: michael.hallsworth@behaviouralinsights.co.uk.
Tim ChadbornPublic Health England, London, UK.
Anna SallisPublic Health England, London, UK.
Michael SandersBehavioural Insights Team, London, UK; Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Daniel BerryDepartment of Health, London, UK.
Felix GreavesPublic Health England, London, UK.
Lara ClementsPublic Health England, London, UK.
Sally C DaviesDepartment of Health, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnnecessary antibiotic prescribing contributes to antimicrobial resistance. In this trial, we aimed to reduce unnecessary prescriptions of antibiotics by general practitioners (GPs) in England.

methodsIn this randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial, publicly available databases were used to identify GP practices whose prescribing rate for antibiotics was in the top 20% for their National Health Service (NHS) Local Area Team. Eligible practices were randomly assigned (1:1) into two groups by computer-generated allocation sequence, stratified by NHS Local Area Team. Participants, but not investigators, were blinded to group assignment. On Sept 29, 2014, every GP in the feedback intervention group was sent a letter from England's Chief Medical Officer and a leaflet on antibiotics for use with patients. The letter stated that the practice was prescribing antibiotics at a higher rate than 80% of practices in its NHS Local Area Team. GPs in the control group received no communication. The sample was re-randomised into two groups, and in December, 2014, GP practices were either sent patient-focused information that promoted reduced use of antibiotics or received no communication. The primary outcome measure was the rate of antibiotic items dispensed per 1000 weighted population, controlling for past prescribing. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN32349954, and has been completed.

findingsBetween Sept 8 and Sept 26, 2014, we recruited and assigned 1581 GP practices to feedback intervention (n=791) or control (n=790) groups. Letters were sent to 3227 GPs in the intervention group. Between October, 2014, and March, 2015, the rate of antibiotic items dispensed per 1000 population was 126.98 (95% CI 125.68-128.27) in the feedback intervention group and 131.25 (130.33-132.16) in the control group, a difference of 4.27 (3.3%; incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.967 [95% CI 0.957-0.977]; p<0.0001), representing an estimated 73,406 fewer antibiotic items dispensed. In December, 2014, GP practices were re-assigned to patient-focused intervention (n=777) or control (n=804) groups. The patient-focused intervention did not significantly affect the primary outcome measure between December, 2014, and March, 2015 (antibiotic items dispensed per 1000 population: 135.00 [95% CI 133.77-136.22] in the patient-focused intervention group and 133.98 [133.06-134.90] in the control group; IRR for difference between groups 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02; p=0.105).

interpretationSocial norm feedback from a high-profile messenger can substantially reduce antibiotic prescribing at low cost and at national scale; this outcome makes it a worthwhile addition to antimicrobial stewardship programmes.

fundingPublic Health England.

Indexed as

Formative FeedbackPractice Patterns, Physicians'Social NormsAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolEnglandFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26898856
PMCPMC4842844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.