Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26898710›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Integrative topological analysis of mass spectrometry data reveals molecular features with clinical relevance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

She-Gan Gao, Rui-Min Liu, Yun-Gang Zhao, Pei Wang, Douglas G Ward, Guang-Chao Wang, Xiang-Qian Guo, Juan Gu, Wan-Bin Niu, Tian Zhang and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

She-Gan GaoHenan Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Cancer Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, P. R. China, 471003.
Rui-Min LiuHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Yun-Gang ZhaoHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Pei WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan University, Kaifeng, China, Henan 475004, P. R. China.
Douglas G WardSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Guang-Chao WangHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Xiang-Qian GuoHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Juan GuHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Wan-Bin NiuHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Tian ZhangHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Ashley MartinSchool of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Zhi-Peng GuoHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Xiao-Shan FengHenan Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Cancer Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, P. R. China, 471003.
Yi-Jun QiHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Yuan-Fang MaHenan Key Laboratory of Engineering Antibody Medicine, Henan International United Laboratory of Antibody Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Henan University School of Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, P.R. China.
Henan University · CNHenan University of Science and Technology · CNUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining MS-based proteomic data with network and topological features of such network would identify more clinically relevant molecules and meaningfully expand the repertoire of proteins derived from MS analysis. The integrative topological indexes representing 95.96% information of seven individual topological measures of node proteins were calculated within a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, built using 244 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) identified by iTRAQ 2D-LC-MS/MS. Compared with DEPs, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and comprehensive features (CFs), structurally dominant nodes (SDNs) based on integrative topological index distribution produced comparable classification performance in three different clinical settings using five independent gene expression data sets. The signature molecules of SDN-based classifier for distinction of early from late clinical TNM stages were enriched in biological traits of protein synthesis, intracellular localization and ribosome biogenesis, which suggests that ribosome biogenesis represents a promising therapeutic target for treating ESCC. In addition, ITGB1 expression selected exclusively by integrative topological measures correlated with clinical stages and prognosis, which was further validated with two independent cohorts of ESCC samples. Thus the integrative topological analysis of PPI networks proposed in this study provides an alternative approach to identify potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets from MS/MS data with functional insights in ESCC.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMembrane ProteinsMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProtein Interaction MapsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBiomarkers, TumorIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsITGB1BP1 protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26898710
PMCPMC4761933
OpenAlexW2281109320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.