Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26898606›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Cellular microenvironment modulates the galvanotaxis of brain tumor initiating cells.

Yu-Ja Huang, Gwendolyn Hoffmann, Benjamin Wheeler, Paula Schiapparelli, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Peter Searson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hydrogel Design to Understand and Guide 3D Cell Migration.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Electrotaxis of Dictyostelium discoideum, Migration in an Electric Field.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Biophysical control of plasticity and patterning in regeneration and cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. EngineeringAPL bioengineering · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu-Ja HuangInstitute for Nanobiotechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Gwendolyn HoffmannInstitute for Nanobiotechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Benjamin WheelerInstitute for Nanobiotechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Paula SchiapparelliDepartment of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Alfredo Quinones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Peter SearsonInstitute for Nanobiotechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

ValidationU54CA151838 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IRIZARRY, RAFAEL ANGEL · 2010 to 2014
$11.9M
An engineered platform for the study of metastasis (PQ #24)R01CA170629 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEARSON, PETER C · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170629NCI NIH HHS R01CA170629NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151838NCI NIH HHS U54CA151838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Galvanotaxis is a complex process that represents the collective outcome of various contributing mechanisms, including asymmetric ion influxes, preferential activation of voltage-gated channels, and electrophoretic redistribution of membrane components. While a large number of studies have focused on various up- and downstream signaling pathways, little is known about how the surrounding microenvironment may interact and contribute to the directional response. Using a customized galvanotaxis chip capable of carrying out experiments in both two- and three-dimensional microenvironments, we show that cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions modulate the galvanotaxis of brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs). Five different BTICs across three different glioblastoma subtypes were examined and shown to all migrate toward the anode in the presence of a direct-current electric field (dcEF) when cultured on a poly-L-ornithine/laminin coated surface, while the fetal-derived neural progenitor cells (fNPCs) migrated toward the cathode. Interestingly, when embedded in a 3D ECM composed of hyaluronic acid and collagen, BTICs exhibited opposite directional response and migrated toward the cathode. Pharmacological inhibition against a panel of key molecules involved in galvanotaxis further revealed the mechanistic differences between 2- and 3D galvanotaxis in BTICs. Both myosin II and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) were found to hold strikingly different roles in different microenvironments.

Indexed as

Cellular MicroenvironmentTaxis ResponseBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorElectric StimulationExtracellular MatrixGlioblastomaHumansIonsMyosin Type IINeoplastic Stem CellsPeptidesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesSignal TransductionIonsMyosin Type IIPeptidesPhosphatidylinositol 3-Kinasespolyornithine

Identifiers

PMID26898606
PMCPMC4761929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.