SynthesisThe Korean journal of internal medicine2016
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric subepithelial tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03082079 (Long Outcome of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Long Outcome of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<2cm) :a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Endoscopic resection of esophageal and gastric submucosal tumors from the muscularis propria layer: submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection versus endoscopic submucosal excavation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Risk of overhydration and low lean tissue index as measured using a body composition monitor in patients on hemodialysis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Sequential injection-electrocoagulation vs. traditional electrocoagulation haemostasis during endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Retrospective comparison of precutting endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small gastric muscularis propria tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Article
- Advancements in endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Techniques, outcomes, and perspectives.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- Complications and recurrence risks after endoscopic resection of digestive neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Observational
- Comparison of endoscopic resection, laparoscopic resection, and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery in esophageal or gastric subepithelial lesions in a Thai medical school.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025Article
- Comparison between interrupted closure technique and traditional closure technique in endoscopic full-thickness resection for treating gastric subepithelial lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and esophageal motility in patients with gastric cardia submucosal tumors and associated changes after endoscopic resection.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Short-term outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clutch cutter for subepithelial lesions within the esophagogastric submucosa: a Japanese prospective observational study.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Endoscopic resection in subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract: Experience at a tertiary referral hospital in The Netherlands.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumor.Journal of gastric cancer · 2024Review
- Prevalence, natural progression, and clinical practices of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions in Korea: a multicenter study.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Recent advances in endoscopic management of gastric neoplasms.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Review
- Endoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Long-Term Outcomes and Comparison of Endoscopic Techniques.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hp and New Gastric Cancer Screening Scoring System for Screening and Prevention of Gastric Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Long-term endoscopic submucosal dissection with postoperative lung injury: a case report.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection on post-operative early treatment effectiveness and serum TAT-2 and GP73 expression levels in patients with early gastric cancer.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- [Endoscopic diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of polyps of the upper gastrointestinal tract].Der Internist · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsTo evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique for the treatment of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs).
methodsA systematic literature review was conducted using the core databases. Data on the complete resection rates and the procedure-related perforation rates were extracted and analyzed. A random effects model was then applied for this meta-analysis.
resultsIn all, 288 patients with 290 SETs were enrolled from nine studies (44 SETs originated from the submucosal layer; 246 SETs originated from the muscularis propria layer). The mean diameter of the lesions ranged from 17.99 to 38 mm. Overall, the pooled complete resection rate was estimated to be 86.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.9 to 91.3). If the analysis was limited to the lesions that originated from the submucosal layer, the pooled complete resection rate was 91.4% (95% CI, 77.9 to 97). If the analysis was limited to the lesions that originated from the muscularis propria, the pooled complete resection rate was 84.4% (95% CI, 78.7 to 88.8). The pooled procedure-related gastric perforation rate was 13% (95% CI, 9.4 to 17.6). Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results. Finally, publication bias was not detected.
conclusionsESD, including endoscopic muscularis dissection, is a technically feasible procedure for the treatment of SETs. However, selection bias is suspected from the enrolled studies. For the development of a proper indication of ESD for SETs, further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.