Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26898509›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2016

Understanding Associations Between Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Negative Consequences of Drinking: a Moderated Mediation Analysis.

Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe, HuiGuo Liu, Lauren M Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Social disparities in alcohol consumption among Canadian emerging adults.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine J Karriker-JaffeAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 400, Emeryville, CA, 94608-1010, USA. kkarrikerjaffe@arg.org.
HuiGuo LiuAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 400, Emeryville, CA, 94608-1010, USA.
Lauren M KaplanAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 400, Emeryville, CA, 94608-1010, USA.

Funding

TREND &STRUCTURE OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE--GENERAL POPULATION 1990 SURVEY DATAP50AA005595 · NIAAA · WESTERN CONSORTIUM FOR PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MARTINEZ, PRISCILLA · 1985 to 2025
$34.1M
GRADUATE RESEARCH TRAINING ON ALCOHOL PROBLEMST32AA007240 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI William C. Kerr · 1985 to 2026
$7.5M
Statistical and Data Services Infrastructure CoreP30AA005595 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI GREENFIELD, THOMAS K · 2006 to 2010
$7.2M
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Alcohol Outcomes: Moderators and MediatorsR21AA018175 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI KARRIKER-JAFFE, KATHERINE J. · 2010 to 2011
$410k
NIAAA NIH HHS P30 AA005595NIAAA NIH HHS P30 AA05595NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA005595NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA018175NIAAA NIH HHS R21AA018175NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007240NIAAA NIH HHS T32AA007240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored how neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) is related to negative consequences of drinking to explain why racial/ethnic minority group members are more at risk than Whites for adverse alcohol outcomes. We tested direct and indirect effects of neighborhood SES on alcohol problems and examined differences by gender and race. We used data from the 2000 and 2005 National Alcohol Surveys (N = 7912 drinkers aged 18 and older; 49 % female) linked with data from the 2000 Decennial Census in multivariate path models adjusting for individual demographics. In the full sample, neighborhood disadvantage had a significant direct path to increased negative consequences, with no indirect paths through depression, positive affect or pro-drinking attitudes. Neighborhood affluence had significant indirect paths to increased negative consequences through greater pro-drinking attitudes and increased heavy drinking. Subgroup analyses showed the indirect path from affluence to consequences held for White men, with no effects of neighborhood disadvantage. For racial/ethnic minority men, significant indirect paths emerged from both neighborhood disadvantage and affluence to increased consequences through greater pro-drinking attitudes and more heavy drinking. For minority women, there was an indirect effect of neighborhood affluence through reduced depression to fewer drinking consequences. There were limited neighborhood effects on alcohol outcomes for White women. Interventions targeting pro-drinking attitudes in both affluent and disadvantaged areas may help reduce alcohol-related problems among men. Initiatives to improve neighborhood conditions could enhance mental health of minority women and reduce alcohol-related health disparities.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingResidence CharacteristicsSocial ClassFemaleHumansMaleAlcoholDepressionNeighborhood socioeconomic statusRacial/ethnic disparities

Identifiers

PMID26898509
PMCPMC5031144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.