Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26898239›Full record

SynthesisBJU international2016

Phytotherapeutic interventions in the management of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review of randomised trials.

Margaret Diana van Die, Kerry M Bone, Jon Emery, Scott G Williams, Marie V Pirotta, Channing J Paller

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJU international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03211104 (Comparison of Duration of Treatment Interruption With or Without Curcumin During the Off Treatment Periods in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03211104 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Duration of Treatment Interruption With or Without Curcumin During the Off Treatment Periods in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy : a Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2007 to 2015Enrolled107ConditionsProstate CancerArmscurcumin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Silymarin (milk thistle extract) as a therapeutic agent in gastrointestinal cancer.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Androgen receptor and soy isoflavones in prostate cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine among Older Adults: Differences between Baby Boomers and Pre-Boomers.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Margaret Diana van DieDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.
Kerry M BoneIntegria (MediHerb), Warwick, Qld, Australia.
Jon EmeryDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.
Scott G WilliamsDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.
Marie V PirottaDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.
Channing J PallerThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Melbourne · AUNew York Chiropractic College · USPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the evidence from randomised trials for the efficacy and safety of phytotherapeutic interventions in the management of biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer, indicated by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, numbers progressing to/time to initiation of androgen-deprivation therapy or salvage therapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsMEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), AMED (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO) and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. Clinical trials investigating phytotherapeutic interventions as dietary supplements or dietary components, including multi-component herbal formulations, in men with BCR prostate cancer were located. Eight of nine authors contacted for further information responded. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias assessment tool. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement for reporting systematic reviews was followed.

resultsOf 23 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, five met the criteria for inclusion. Two studies were placebo controlled; two were active control trials; and one a high-/low-dose trial. The interventions were administered as isolated phytochemicals (sulphoraphane), phytotherapeutic extracts [Pomi-T (pomegranate, turmeric, green tea and broccoli sprout extract), soy, lycopene, and POMx (pomegranate extract)], or plant-derived dietary items (soy and lycopene). All studies found serum PSA levels to stabilise, decrease or rise more slowly in a significant number of men, and three studies reported stabilising or lengthening of PSA-doubling time. Studies were generally of good quality, but sample sizes were predominantly small, and durations short.

conclusionsHigh-quality studies in this area are lacking. Sulphoraphane, lycopene, soy isoflavones, POMx, and Pomi-T are safe and well tolerated. There is limited evidence that they can affect PSA dynamics. No recommendation can be made for the use of these agents in managing prostate cancer morbidity and mortality until high-quality, fully powered studies are available. Recommendations are made for improving reproducibility and translation of findings with regard to study population, study endpoints, design, and the reporting of phytotherapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

PhytotherapyAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBrassicaCarotenoidsCurcumaGlycine maxHumansIsothiocyanatesLycopeneLythraceaeMalePlant ExtractsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSulfoxidesAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCarotenoidsIsothiocyanatesLycopenePlant ExtractsProstate-Specific AntigensulforaphaneSulfoxidesTeabiochemical recurrenceclinical trialsherbal medicinephytotherapyprostate cancersystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26898239
PMCPMC8631186
OpenAlexW2296257954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.