Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26897656›Full record

Trial reportReproductive health2016

CHARM, a gender equity and family planning intervention for men and couples in rural India: protocol for the cluster randomized controlled trial evaluation.

Jennifer Yore, Anindita Dasgupta, Mohan Ghule, Madhusadana Battala, Saritha Nair, Jay Silverman, Niranjan Saggurti, Donta Balaiah, Anita Raj

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01593943 phase3completednot on this map

Gender Equity-Focused, Male-Centered Family Planning for Rural India

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2012 to 2014Enrolled2,162ConditionsFamily PlanningArmsCHARM
NCT03514914 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Male Participation in Interventions to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2018 to 2020Enrolled2,402ConditionsContraceptionArmsThe CHARM2 Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Theory-based interventions for contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer YoreCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA. jyore@ucsd.edu.
Anindita DasguptaCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA. adasgupta@ucsd.edu.
Mohan GhuleNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India. drmohang@gmail.com.
Madhusadana BattalaPopulation Council, New Delhi, India. mbattala@popcouncil.org.
Saritha NairNational Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India. saritha_nair@yahoo.co.uk.
Jay SilvermanCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA. jgsilverman@ucsd.edu.
Niranjan SaggurtiBill and Melinda Gates Foundation (formerly of Population Council), New Delhi, India. Niranjan.Saggurti@gatesfoundation.org.
Donta BalaiahNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India. bdonta200@yahoo.co.in.
Anita RajCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA. anitaraj@ucsd.edu.
Center for Health and Gender Equity · USNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · INNational Institute of Medical Statistics · INPopulation Council · INPopulation Council Institute · INUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Gender Equity-Focused, Male-Centered Family Planning for Rural IndiaR01HD061115 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BATTALA, MADHUSUDANA, RAJ, ANITA · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061115NICHD NIH HHS R01HD61115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, 41% of all pregnancies are unintended, increasing risk for unsafe abortion, miscarriage and maternal and child morbidities and mortality. One in four pregnancies in India (3.3 million pregnancies, annually) are unintended; 2/3 of these occur in the context of no modern contraceptive use. In addition, no contraceptive use until desired number and sex composition of children is achieved remains a norm in India. Research shows that globally and in India, the youngest and most newly married wives are least likely to use contraception and most likely to report husband's exclusive family planning decision-making control, suggesting that male engagement and family planning support is important for this group. Thus, the Counseling Husbands to Achieve Reproductive Health and Marital Equity (CHARM) intervention was developed in recognition of the need for more male engagement family planning models that include gender equity counseling and focus on spacing contraception use in rural India. METHODS/

designFor this study, a multi-session intervention delivered to men but inclusive of their wives was developed and evaluated as a two-armed cluster randomized controlled design study conducted across 50 mapped clusters in rural Maharashtra, India. Eligible rural young husbands and their wives (N = 1081) participated in a three session gender-equity focused family planning program delivered to the men (Sessions 1 and 2) and their wives (Session 3) by village health providers in rural India. Survey assessments were conducted at baseline and 9&18 month follow-ups with eligible men and their wives, and pregnancy tests were obtained from wives at baseline and 18-month follow-up. Additional in-depth understanding of how intervention impact occurred was assessed via in-depth interviews at 18 month follow-up with VHPs and a subsample of couples (n = 50, 2 couples per intervention cluster). Process evaluation was conducted to collect feedback from husbands, wives, and VHPs on program quality and to ascertain whether program elements were implemented according to curriculum protocols. Fidelity to intervention protocol was assessed via review of clinical records. DISCUSSION: All study procedures were completed in February 2015. Findings from this work offer important contributions to the growing field of male engagement in family planning, globally.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01593943.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorCulturally Competent CareFamily Planning ServicesReproductive BehaviorRural HealthAdolescentAdultCluster AnalysisCommunity Health WorkersFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFocus GroupsGroup ProcessesHumansIndiaLongitudinal Studies

Identifiers

PMID26897656
PMCPMC4761168
OpenAlexW2275688947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.