Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26897627›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2016

Validating and reliability testing the descriptive data and three different disease diagnoses of the internet-based DOGRISK questionnaire.

Johanna Roine, Liisa Uusitalo, Anna Hielm-Björkman

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johanna RoineFaculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, Helsinki, Finland. johanna.roine@helsinki.fi.
Liisa UusitaloFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57, Helsinki, Finland. liisa.uusitalo@helsinki.fi.
Anna Hielm-BjörkmanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57, Helsinki, Finland. anna.hielm-bjorkman@helsinki.fi.
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe DOGRISK questionnaire is an internet-based ongoing study of canine nutrition, living environment, and disease. Here we aim to assess the performance of the questionnaire using data from the first three years in relation to some descriptive and disease variables. We used associated questions, official register records, test-retest repeatability, and email/mail contact with questionnaire respondents.

resultsReliability against an official register of gender, season of birth, breed, and results of hip radiography was tested and Cohen's Kappa was between 0.95-0.99. Internal consistencies of hypothyroidism status and dog's age were calculated using Cronbach's Alpha (α = 0.95 and α = 0.99, respectively). Test-retest repeatability of ten variables among 224 participants was analyzed. Gender, season of birth, and born in owner family had Cohen's Kappa > 0.86, color of coat, vaccination status as an adult, other dogs in household, and vaccination status as a puppy had Cohen's Kappa between 0.67-0.80, and body condition score under two months of age and tidiness of household, had Cohen's kappa of 0.45 and 0.42, respectively. In addition, time spent outside had Cohen's kappa of 0.37. Of the owners contacted by email/mail to confirm their dog's atopy/allergy (skin symptoms), 8.9% reported that they had given an incorrect answer (positive predicted value 91%), but only 69% of all reaffirmed positive answers had a diagnosis set by a veterinarian.

conclusionsOur study showed that owners were diligent with basic information and with the status of three diseases. Cohen's Kappa in the reliability of the test-retest was in most variables at least 0.67. We propose that the descriptive variables and the disease variables be used as such when we generate hypotheses from the DOGRISK data.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedDogsInternetSurveys and QuestionnairesAnimalsDog DiseasesPetsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26897627
PMCPMC4761135
OpenAlexW2280306573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.