Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26897169›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2016

Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study.

Janet Heaton, Jo Day, Nicky Britten

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03699137 (Use and Impact of the Pre-hospital 12-lead Electrocardiogram in the Primary PCI Era), which is not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03699137 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Use and Impact of the Pre-hospital 12-lead Electrocardiogram in the Primary PCI Era: Mixed Methods Study (PHECG2)

TypeobservationalSponsorKingston UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled420,048ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, STEMI, Non STEMIArmsNo interventions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Co-Production in Adolescent Health Research: A Mixed Methods Study From Born in Bradford.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. SOARNet: Establishing an older adult focused practice-based research network.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Co-Creation Study Protocol for Developing a Nurse-Led Intervention to Deprescribe Benzodiazepines and Z-Hypnotics in Primary Care Aimed at Empowering Women.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A virtuous cycle of co-production: Reflections from a community priority-setting exercise.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janet HeatonInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2SL, UK. j.heaton@exeter.ac.uk.
Jo DayInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2SL, UK. j.k.day@exeter.ac.uk.
Nicky BrittenInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2SL, UK. n.britten@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2008, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) began funding a major 5-year pilot research programme of translational research in England, establishing nine 'Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care' (CLAHRCs). A number of evaluations were carried out to examine whether or not the various collaborations worked as intended and why. In this paper, we examine what the theory of co-production adds to understanding of processes of knowledge creation and translation we observed in one of the CLAHRCs.

methodsA case study of a successful knowledge translation project was identified from our wider realist evaluation of the mechanisms of closer collaboration at play in the CLAHRC. In the project, a computer simulation model of an emergency pathway for acute ischaemic stroke was built to explore if and how the time between the onset and treatment of the condition could be minimised by redesigning the pathway. The aim of the case study was to improve our understanding of the nature and workings of the mechanisms of closer collaboration that were associated with the more successful projects by examining the relevance of the theory of co-production. Qualitative methods of analysis were used to explore the fit between the mechanisms of closer collaboration we observed in the realist evaluation and the principles of co-production we identified from the literature.

resultsWe found a close fit between the nine mechanisms of closer collaboration at work in the project and the principles of co-production (active agents; equality of partners; reciprocity and mutuality; transformative; and facilitated). The successful style of collaborative working exemplified by the project was consistent with a strong form of co-production.

conclusionsIn our view, the theory of co-production provides useful insights into what it is about the qualities of collaborative working that inspire the requisite mechanisms for generating knowledge that is translated into practice. The theory provides a potentially useful basis for future knowledge translation programmes and projects in applied health research in a range of contexts.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDiffusion of InnovationEnglandEvidence-Based PracticeHealth Services ResearchModels, OrganizationalOrganizational Case StudiesPractice Guidelines as TopicStrokeTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID26897169
PMCPMC4761144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.