Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26897131›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2016

Microbiological profiles of fungal keratitis: a 10-year study at a tertiary referral center.

Joanne W Ho, Mark M Fernandez, Rachelle A Rebong, Alan N Carlson, Terry Kim, Natalie A Afshari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From trauma to brain:IDCases · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fungal keratitis in Iran: Risk factors, clinical features, and mycological profile.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnosing Fungal Keratitis and Simultaneously IdentifyingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Mycotic Keratitis-A Global Threat from the Filamentous Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An Omics Approach to Diagnosing or Investigating Fungal Keratitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joanne W HoShiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. jwh009@ucsd.edu.
Mark M FernandezDuke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. mark.fernandez@gmail.com.
Rachelle A RebongDuke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. rachelle.rebong@gmail.com.
Alan N CarlsonDuke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. alan.carlson@duke.edu.
Terry KimDuke Eye Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. terry.kim@duke.edu.
Natalie A AfshariShiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. DrAfshari@ucsd.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the rise in cases of fungal keratitis in recent years, this study was performed to better elucidate the microbiological profile, risk factors, and surgical intervention rates of fungal keratitis at a tertiary referral center in the Southeastern USA.

findingsThis is a retrospective case series of fungal keratitis infections treated at Duke University Eye Center from January 1, 1998, to October 6, 2008. Of the 4651 culture-proven corneal ulcers identified, 63 (1.4 %) were positive for fungal keratitis with a total of 69 fungal organisms isolated. The majority of isolates were filamentous species (44 of 69, 64 %), and the most commonly isolated organism was Curvularia (11 of 69, 16 %). Bacterial coinfections were found in 24 of the 63 cases (38 %). The most commonly associated risk factors were contact lens wear (n = 15, 24 %) and prior penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) (n = 15, 24 %). Twenty-three cases (37 %) required surgical intervention. The rate of surgical intervention was highest in patients with prior PKP (7/15, 47 %).

conclusionsIn this study, the leading risk factors for fungal keratitis were contact lens wear and prior PKP. Filamentous species were the most common causative pathogens. A relatively high rate of mixed bacterial-fungal infections was found. Patients with prior PKP were more likely to require surgery than patients without history of keratoplasties.

Indexed as

Contact lensCorneaFungal keratitisMicrobiologyPenetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID26897131
PMCPMC4761361
OpenAlexW2284144580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.