Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26897036›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2016

Prognostic role of HER2 amplification based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC): a meta-analysis.

Xiaoping Li, Hua Zhao, Jianchun Gu, Leizhen Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ISH-based HER2 diagnostics.Der Pathologe · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. PET and SPECT Imaging of the EGFR Family (RTK Class I) in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. [ISH-based HER2 diagnostics].Der Pathologe · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoping LiDepartment of Oncology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200092, China. lxpyahoo@hotmail.com.
Hua ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, Baoshan People Hospital, Yunnan, 678000, China.
Jianchun GuDepartment of Oncology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Leizhen ZhengDepartment of Oncology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
XinHua Hospital · CNBaoshan College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have shown that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) may play an important role in the invasion and metastasis of pancreatic cancer, but the relationship between HER2 amplification level and prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients is still controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of HER2 amplification based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in patients with pancreatic cancer.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (Jan 2001 to Jun 2015) were searched. Only articles that detect the HER2 amplification by FISH method were included. RevMan 5.3 and STATA version 12 were used to perform this meta-analysis. Pooled calculations were carried out on hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the risk of disease.

resultsA total of six eligible studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. The univariate analysis results showed that HER2 amplification was not significantly associated with patients' overall survival (pooled HR, 1.87, 95% CI, 0.64-5.46, P=0.25), which are maintained in one study of multivariate analysis (HR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.12-2.14, P=0.358). HER2 amplification also had no correlation with clinicopathological factors such as age, gender, lymph node metastasis, and tumor stage.

conclusionsOur results showed that HER2 amplification based on FISH may not be a good prognostic factor for survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID26897036
PMCPMC4761213
OpenAlexW2284765038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.