Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26897032›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2016

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2015 end of year summary: tissue oxygenation and microcirculation.

T W L Scheeren

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. The microcirculation and its measurement in sepsis.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

T W L ScheerenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. t.w.l.scheeren@umcg.nl.
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Last year we started this series of end of year summaries of papers published in the 2014 issues of the Journal Of Clinical Monitoring And Computing with a review on near infrared spectroscopy (Scheeren et al. in J Clin Monit Comput 29(2):217-220, 2015). This year we will broaden the scope and include papers published in the field of tissue oxygenation and microcirculation, or a combination of both entities. We present some promising new technologies that might enable a deeper insight into the (patho)physiology of certain diseases such as sepsis, but also in healthy volunteers. These may help researchers and clinicians to evaluate both tissue oxygenation and microcirculation beyond macro-hemodynamic measurements usually available at the bedside.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Flow VelocityBlood Volume DeterminationHumansMicrocirculationMonitoring, PhysiologicOximetryPeriodicals as TopicMicrocirculationMitochondrial functionMonitoringNIRSTissue oxygenationVascular occlusion test

Identifiers

PMID26897032
PMCPMC4792340
OpenAlexW2275845619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.