ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2016
Positron emission tomography of high-grade gliomas.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroinflammation and immunoregulation in glioblastoma and brain metastases: Recent developments in imaging approaches.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2021Review
- Therapeutic Efficiency of Multiple Applications of Magnetic Hyperthermia Technique in Glioblastoma Using Aminosilane Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: In Vitro and In Vivo Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Effects of Photons Irradiation onFrontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of Radiolabeled Peptides for PET Imaging of Glioblastoma Multiforme.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- The Path Toward PET-Guided Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma in Laboratory Animals: A Mini Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Review
- Positron emission tomography of sodium glucose cotransport activity in high grade astrocytomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- PET imaging ofEJNMMI research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-grade gliomas [HGG (WHO grades III-IV)] are almost invariably fatal. Imaging of HGG is important for orientating diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning and is crucial for development of novel, more effective therapies. Given the potentially unlimited number of usable tracing molecules and the elevated number of available radionuclides, PET allows gathering multiple informations on HGG including data on tissue metabolism and drug pharmacokinetics. PET studies on the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of HGG carried out by most frequently used tracers and radionuclides ((11)C and (18)F) and published in 2014 have been reviewed. These studies demonstrate that a thorough choice of tracers may confer elevated diagnostic and prognostic power to PET imaging of HGG. They also suggest that a combination of PET and MRI may give the most complete and reliable imaging information on HGG and that research on hybrid PET/MRI may be paying back in terms of improved diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning of these deadly tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26897013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.