Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26896847›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016

Ensembl comparative genomics resources.

Javier Herrero, Matthieu Muffato, Kathryn Beal, Stephen Fitzgerald, Leo Gordon, Miguel Pignatelli, Albert J Vilella, Stephen M J Searle, Ridwan Amode, Simon Brent and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 237 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
237citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

237 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

177 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Javier HerreroEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, Bill Lyons Informatics Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, flicek@ebi.ac.uk javier.herrero@ucl.ac.uk muffato@ebi.ac.uk.
Matthieu MuffatoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD.
Kathryn BealEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD.
Stephen FitzgeraldEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD.
Leo GordonEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD.
Miguel PignatelliEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD.
Albert J VilellaEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD.
Stephen M J SearleWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA.
Ridwan AmodeEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA.
Simon BrentWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA.
William SpoonerEagle Genomics Ltd., Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK, and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
Eugene KuleshaEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA.
Andrew YatesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD.
Paul FlicekEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, flicek@ebi.ac.uk.

Funding

UniProt: A Centralized Protein Sequence and Function ResourceU41HG006104 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI APWEILER, ROLF · 2010 to 2014
$23.5M
Comprehensive Identification of Active Functional Elements in Human ChromatinU54HG004563 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CRAWFORD, GREGORY E · 2007 to 2011
$9.7M
EDAC: ENCODE Data Analysis CenterU01HG004695 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI BIRNEY, EWAN · 2008 to 2012
$6.4M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E011640/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I025360/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I025360/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I025506/1NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004695NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG004695NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG006104NHGRI NIH HHS U41HG006104NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004563NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG004563Wellcome Trust WT095908Wellcome Trust WT098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution provides the unifying framework with which to understand biology. The coherent investigation of genic and genomic data often requires comparative genomics analyses based on whole-genome alignments, sets of homologous genes and other relevant datasets in order to evaluate and answer evolutionary-related questions. However, the complexity and computational requirements of producing such data are substantial: this has led to only a small number of reference resources that are used for most comparative analyses. The Ensembl comparative genomics resources are one such reference set that facilitates comprehensive and reproducible analysis of chordate genome data. Ensembl computes pairwise and multiple whole-genome alignments from which large-scale synteny, per-base conservation scores and constrained elements are obtained. Gene alignments are used to define Ensembl Protein Families, GeneTrees and homologies for both protein-coding and non-coding RNA genes. These resources are updated frequently and have a consistent informatics infrastructure and data presentation across all supported species. Specialized web-based visualizations are also available including synteny displays, collapsible gene tree plots, a gene family locator and different alignment views. The Ensembl comparative genomics infrastructure is extensively reused for the analysis of non-vertebrate species by other projects including Ensembl Genomes and Gramene and much of the information here is relevant to these projects. The consistency of the annotation across species and the focus on vertebrates makes Ensembl an ideal system to perform and support vertebrate comparative genomic analyses. We use robust software and pipelines to produce reference comparative data and make it freely available. Database URL: http://www.ensembl.org.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDNA, ComplementaryEvolution, MolecularExpressed Sequence TagsHumansPhylogenyQuality ControlRNA, UntranslatedSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNASoftwareDNA, ComplementaryRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID26896847
PMCPMC4761110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.