Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26896801›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Substrate recognition and cleavage-site selection by a single-subunit protein-only RNase P.

Nadia Brillante, Markus Gößringer, Dominik Lindenhofer, Ursula Toth, Walter Rossmanith, Roland K Hartmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mitochondrial protein synthesis quality control.Human molecular genetics · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. How RNases Shape Mitochondrial Transcriptomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Structural basis of RNA processing by human mitochondrial RNase P.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular recognition of pre-tRNA byRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadia BrillanteCenter for Anatomy & Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Markus GößringerInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Dominik LindenhoferCenter for Anatomy & Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Ursula TothCenter for Anatomy & Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Walter RossmanithCenter for Anatomy & Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria walter.rossmanith@meduniwien.ac.at.
Roland K HartmannInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany roland.hartmann@staff.uni-marburg.de.
Medical University of Vienna · ATPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNase P is the enzyme that removes 5' extensions from tRNA precursors. With its diversity of enzyme forms-either protein- or RNA-based, ranging from single polypeptides to multi-subunit ribonucleoproteins-the RNase P enzyme family represents a unique model system to compare the evolution of enzymatic mechanisms. Here we present a comprehensive study of substrate recognition and cleavage-site selection by the nuclear single-subunit proteinaceous RNase P PRORP3 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Compared to bacterial RNase P, the best-characterized RNA-based enzyme form, PRORP3 requires a larger part of intact tRNA structure, but little to no determinants at the cleavage site or interactions with the 5' or 3' extensions of the tRNA. The cleavage site depends on the combined dimensions of acceptor stem and T domain, but also requires the leader to be single-stranded. Overall, the single-subunit PRORP appears mechanistically more similar to the complex nuclear ribonucleoprotein enzymes than to the simpler bacterial RNase P. Mechanistic similarity or dissimilarity among different forms of RNase P thus apparently do not necessarily reflect molecular composition or evolutionary relationship.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBacillus subtilisBase SequenceCloning, MolecularConserved SequenceEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionIsoenzymesMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationRecombinant ProteinsRibonuclease PRNA, BacterialRNA, PlantArabidopsis ProteinsIsoenzymesPRORP1 protein, ArabidopsisPRORP3 protein, ArabidopsisRecombinant ProteinsRibonuclease PRNA, BacterialRNA, PlantRNA PrecursorsRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID26896801
PMCPMC4797305
OpenAlexW2287545739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.