Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26896298›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Development of a nomogram combining clinical staging with (18)F-FDG PET/CT image features in non-small-cell lung cancer stage I-III.

Marie-Charlotte Desseroit, Dimitris Visvikis, Florent Tixier, Mohamed Majdoub, Rémy Perdrisot, Rémy Guillevin, Catherine Cheze Le Rest, Mathieu Hatt

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Radiomic Features: A Systematic Review.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Heterogeneity of Glycolytic Phenotype Determined byDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Prediction of EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma based onAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Joint EANM/SNMMI/ESTRO practice recommendations for the use of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  16. A review on advances inInsights into imaging · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Charlotte DesseroitNuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Poitiers, France. Marie-Charlotte.Desseroit@univ-brest.fr.
Dimitris VisvikisINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, CHRU Morvan, University of Brest, 2 avenue Foch, 29609, Brest, France.
Florent TixierNuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Mohamed MajdoubINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, CHRU Morvan, University of Brest, 2 avenue Foch, 29609, Brest, France.
Rémy PerdrisotNuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Rémy GuillevinMedical school, EE DACTIM, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Catherine Cheze Le RestNuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Mathieu HattINSERM, UMR 1101, LaTIM, CHRU Morvan, University of Brest, 2 avenue Foch, 29609, Brest, France.
Université de Poitiers · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur goal was to develop a nomogram by exploiting intratumour heterogeneity on CT and PET images from routine (18)F-FDG PET/CT acquisitions to identify patients with the poorest prognosis.

methodsThis retrospective study included 116 patients with NSCLC stage I, II or III and with staging (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Primary tumour volumes were delineated using the FLAB algorithm and 3D Slicer™ on PET and CT images, respectively. PET and CT heterogeneities were quantified using texture analysis. The reproducibility of the CT features was assessed on a separate test-retest dataset. The stratification power of the PET/CT features was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The best standard metric (functional volume) was combined with the least redundant and most prognostic PET/CT heterogeneity features to build the nomogram.

resultsPET entropy and CT zone percentage had the highest complementary values with clinical stage and functional volume. The nomogram improved stratification amongst patients with stage II and III disease, allowing identification of patients with the poorest prognosis (clinical stage III, large tumour volume, high PET heterogeneity and low CT heterogeneity).

conclusionIntratumour heterogeneity quantified using textural features on both CT and PET images from routine staging (18)F-FDG PET/CT acquisitions can be used to create a nomogram with higher stratification power than staging alone.

Indexed as

NomogramsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenHeterogeneityNSCLCPET/CTPrognosisTextural features

Identifiers

PMID26896298
PMCPMC5409954
OpenAlexW2280762250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.