Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26896256›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2016

Evaluating In Vivo-In Vitro Correlation Using a Bayesian Approach.

Junshan Qiu, Marilyn Martinez, Ram Tiwari

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Bayesian estimation in NONMEM.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junshan QiuOffice of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. junshan.qiu@fda.hhs.gov.
Marilyn MartinezOffice of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Ram TiwariOffice of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Bayesian approach with frequentist validity has been developed to support inferences derived from a "Level A" in vivo-in vitro correlation (IVIVC). Irrespective of whether the in vivo data reflect in vivo dissolution or absorption, the IVIVC is typically assessed using a linear regression model. Confidence intervals are generally used to describe the uncertainty around the model. While the confidence intervals can describe population-level variability, it does not address the individual-level variability. Thus, there remains an inability to define a range of individual-level drug concentration-time profiles across a population based upon the "Level A" predictions. This individual-level prediction is distinct from what can be accomplished by a traditional linear regression approach where the focus of the statistical assessment is at a marginal rather than an individual level. The objective of this study is to develop a hierarchical Bayesian method for evaluation of IVIVC, incorporating both the individual- and population-level variability, and to use this method to derive Bayesian tolerance intervals with matching priors that have frequentist validity in evaluating an IVIVC. In so doing, we can now generate population profiles that incorporate not only variability in subject pharmacokinetics but also the variability in the in vivo product performance.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, TheoreticalIVIVCMCMCprobability matching priortolerance intervalsWeibull distribution

Identifiers

PMID26896256
PMCPMC5256600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.