Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895989›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Understanding quit decisions in primary care: a qualitative study of older GPs.

Anna Sansom, Raff Calitri, Mary Carter, John Campbell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. GP workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Trends in GP incomes in England, 2008-2017: a retrospective analysis of repeated postal surveys.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  15. Malpractice litigation, workload, and general practitioner retirement.Primary health care research & development · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. What is the root cause of the GP workforce crisis?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna SansomUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Raff CalitriUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Mary CarterUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
John CampbellUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/14/196/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the reasons behind intentions to quit direct patient care among experienced general practitioners (GPs) aged 50-60 years. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study based on semistructured interviews with GPs in the South West region of England. Transcribed interviews were analysed thematically.

participants23 GPs aged 50-60 years: 3 who had retired from direct patient care before age 60, and 20 who intended to quit direct patient care within the next 5 years.

resultsThe analysis identified four key themes: early retirement is a viable option for many GPs; GPs have employment options other than undertaking direct patient care; GPs report feeling they are doing an (almost) undoable job; and GPs may have other aspirations that pull them away from practice. Findings from this study confirmed those from earlier research, with high workload, ageing and health, family and domestic life, and organisational change all influencing GPs' decisions about when to retire/quit direct patient care. However, in addition, GPs expressed feelings of insecurity and uncertainty regarding the future of general practice, low morale, and issues regarding accountability (appraisal and revalidation) and governance. Suggestions about how to help retain GPs within the active clinical workforce were offered, covering individual, practice and organisational levels.

conclusionsThis research highlights aspects of the current professional climate for GPs that are having an impact on retirement decisions. Any future changes to policy or practice to help retain experienced GPs will benefit from this informed understanding of GPs' views. Key factors to take into account include: making the GP workload more manageable; managing change sympathetically; paying attention to GPs' own health; improving confidence in the future of general practice; and improving GP morale.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelQualitative ResearchEnglandFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansIntentionInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRetirementPRIMARY CAREQUALITATIVE RESEARCHretirementworkforce

Identifiers

PMID26895989
PMCPMC4762139
OpenAlexW2276017509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.