Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895873›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2016

Further Defining the Role of the Laboratory Genetic Counselor.

Lindsey Waltman, Cassandra Runke, Jessica Balcom, Jacquelyn D Riley, Margaret Lilley, Susan Christian, Lindsay Zetzsche, McKinsey L Goodenberger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolving Roles of Genetic Counselors in the Clinical Laboratory.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  11. The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lindsey WaltmanMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. waltman.lindsey@mayo.edu.
Cassandra RunkeMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jessica BalcomMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jacquelyn D RileyCleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave. LL2-2, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Margaret LilleyUniversity of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 St. NW, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Susan ChristianUniversity of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 St. NW, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lindsay ZetzscheMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
McKinsey L GoodenbergerMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory genetic counseling is becoming increasingly common as a result of increased laboratory services and genetic testing menus, as well as growing job responsibilities. Christian et al. (2012) provided the first quantitative data regarding the roles of the laboratory-based genetic counselor (LBGC) finding that two of the most prevalent roles are as customer liaisons and communicators of test results. The goal of the present study was to further delineate the role of the LBGC by addressing specific tasks that LBGCs are involved with on a day-to-day basis. A survey was designed to expand upon themes identified in the Christian et al. (2012) study by querying specific tasks performed in several categories of potential LBGC job duties. An invitation for LBGCs to participate was distributed via email to the membership of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) and the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors (CAGC). We identified 121 genetic counselors who primarily work in the laboratory setting or whose job role includes a laboratory component. Almost all respondents performed customer liaison/case coordination (95 %), and interpretation and result reporting (88 %). The most frequently performed tasks within these categories involved addressing questions from clients, making phone calls with genetic testing results, obtaining clinical or family history information for results interpretation, and composing case-specific interpretations for unique results and/or obtaining literature references to support interpretations. The study results also point to trends of expanding roles in sales and marketing, variant interpretation and management responsibilities. Results of this study may be useful to further define the full scope of practice of LBGCs, aid in the development of new LBGC positions and expand current positions to include roles related to test development, research, and student supervision. It may also aid in curriculum updates for training programs to increase exposure to LBGC roles.

Indexed as

CounselorsGenetic CounselingJob DescriptionLaboratory PersonnelAdultCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultGenetic counselorLaboratoryNon-clinicalRoles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.