ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2016
Type I IFN Does Not Promote Susceptibility to Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes.
Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dual role of type I interferons in bacterial infections: from immune defense to pathogenesis.mBio · 2025Review
- Type I interferons in bacterial diseases: myeloid cells at the crossroads of protection and pathology.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Role of Type I Interferons duringBiomolecules · 2024Review
- Recognition ofInnate immunity · 2023Review
- Type I Interferon Signaling on Antigen-Presenting Cells Blunts Cell-Mediated Immunity toward Listeria monocytogenes.Infection and immunity · 2023Article
- The use of foodborne infection to evaluate bacterial pathogenesis and host response.Methods in cell biology · 2022Article
- Review
- Nod-like Receptors: Critical Intracellular Sensors for Host Protection and Cell Death in Microbial and Parasitic Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Bias of the Immune Response toJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Impact of Type I Interferons on Susceptibility to Bacterial Pathogens.Trends in microbiology · 2021Review
- Secretion of c-di-AMP by Listeria monocytogenes Leads to a STING-Dependent Antibacterial Response during Enterocolitis.Infection and immunity · 2020Article
- Enrichment of Neutrophils and Monocytes From the Liver Following Either Oral or Intravenous Listeria monocytogenes Infection.Current protocols in immunology · 2020Article
- Pathogenic Biohacking: Induction, Modulation and Subversion of Host Transcriptional Responses byToxins · 2020Review
- Select autophagy genes maintain quiescence of tissue-resident macrophages and increase susceptibility to Listeria monocytogenes.Nature microbiology · 2020Article
- MicroRNA-30e-5p Regulates SOCS1 and SOCS3 During Bacterial Infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
- Context Is Key: Delineating the Unique Functions of IFNα and IFNβ in Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Ligand-induced IFNGR1 down-regulation calibrates myeloid cell IFNγ responsiveness.Life science alliance · 2019Article
- Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses duringMicrobiology spectrum · 2019Article
- Sources of Type I Interferons in Infectious Immunity: Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Not Always in the Driver's Seat.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Emerging Roles of Autophagy and Inflammasome in Ehrlichiosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Type I IFN (IFN-α/β) is thought to enhance growth of the foodborne intracellular pathogen Listeria monocytogenes by promoting mechanisms that dampen innate immunity to infection. However, the type I IFN response has been studied primarily using methods that bypass the stomach and, therefore, fail to replicate the natural course of L. monocytogenes infection. In this study, we compared i.v. and foodborne transmission of L. monocytogenes in mice lacking the common type I IFN receptor (IFNAR1(-/-)). Contrary to what was observed using i.v. infection, IFNAR1(-/-) and wild-type mice had similar bacterial burdens in the liver and spleen following foodborne infection. Splenocytes from wild-type mice infected i.v. produced significantly more IFN-β than did those infected by the foodborne route. Consequently, the immunosuppressive effects of type I IFN signaling, which included T cell death, increased IL-10 secretion, and repression of neutrophil recruitment to the spleen, were all observed following i.v. but not foodborne transmission of L. monocytogenes. Type I IFN was also previously shown to cause a loss of responsiveness to IFN-γ through downregulation of the IFN-γ receptor α-chain on macrophages and dendritic cells. However, we detected a decrease in surface expression of IFN-γ receptor α-chain even in the absence of IFN-α/β signaling, suggesting that in vivo, this infection-induced phenotype is not type I IFN-dependent. These results highlight the importance of using the natural route of infection for studies of host-pathogen interactions and suggest that the detrimental effects of IFN-α/β signaling on the innate immune response to L. monocytogenes may be an artifact of the i.v. infection model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.