Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895837›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2016

Type I IFN Does Not Promote Susceptibility to Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes.

Michelle G Pitts, Tanya Myers-Morales, Sarah E F D'Orazio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Recognition ofInnate immunity · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Bias of the Immune Response toJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. MicroRNA-30e-5p Regulates SOCS1 and SOCS3 During Bacterial Infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses duringMicrobiology spectrum · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle G PittsDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536.
Tanya Myers-MoralesDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536.
Sarah E F D'OrazioDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536 sarah.dorazio@uky.edu.

Funding

Role of Rapid IFNg Secretion by CD*+ T cells in Clearance of Food Borne ListeriaR01AI101373 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI D'ORAZIO, SARAH E. F. · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI101373NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI101373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type I IFN (IFN-α/β) is thought to enhance growth of the foodborne intracellular pathogen Listeria monocytogenes by promoting mechanisms that dampen innate immunity to infection. However, the type I IFN response has been studied primarily using methods that bypass the stomach and, therefore, fail to replicate the natural course of L. monocytogenes infection. In this study, we compared i.v. and foodborne transmission of L. monocytogenes in mice lacking the common type I IFN receptor (IFNAR1(-/-)). Contrary to what was observed using i.v. infection, IFNAR1(-/-) and wild-type mice had similar bacterial burdens in the liver and spleen following foodborne infection. Splenocytes from wild-type mice infected i.v. produced significantly more IFN-β than did those infected by the foodborne route. Consequently, the immunosuppressive effects of type I IFN signaling, which included T cell death, increased IL-10 secretion, and repression of neutrophil recruitment to the spleen, were all observed following i.v. but not foodborne transmission of L. monocytogenes. Type I IFN was also previously shown to cause a loss of responsiveness to IFN-γ through downregulation of the IFN-γ receptor α-chain on macrophages and dendritic cells. However, we detected a decrease in surface expression of IFN-γ receptor α-chain even in the absence of IFN-α/β signaling, suggesting that in vivo, this infection-induced phenotype is not type I IFN-dependent. These results highlight the importance of using the natural route of infection for studies of host-pathogen interactions and suggest that the detrimental effects of IFN-α/β signaling on the innate immune response to L. monocytogenes may be an artifact of the i.v. infection model.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityAnimalsDendritic CellsDisease Models, AnimalGene ExpressionInterferon-betaInterferon Type IListeria monocytogenesListeriosisLymphocyte DepletionMacrophagesMiceMice, KnockoutNeutrophil InfiltrationNeutrophilsReceptors, InterferonInterferon-betaInterferon Type IReceptors, Interferon

Identifiers

PMID26895837
PMCPMC4799772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.