Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895807›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP

Utilization of free medication samples in the United States in a nationally representative sample: 2009-2013.

Joshua D Brown, Pratik A Doshi, Jeffery C Talbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?Health care management science · 2020
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua D BrownInstitute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 S. Limestone St #292E, Lexington, KY, USA. Electronic address: josh.brown@uky.edu.
Pratik A DoshiInstitute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 S. Limestone St #292E, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jeffery C TalbertInstitute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 S. Limestone St #292E, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManufacturers provide free sample medications as a means to increase use of branded medications. Sample use varies year-to-year as branded product patents expire and new products come to market.

objectiveThis study sought to describe the use of sample medications during 2009-2013 and assess individual characteristics associated with sample use.

methodsData from the 2009-2013 U.S. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) were used. MEPS asks participants whether they received each medication they are taking as a sample. The top 10 medications and medication classes used each year by volume were identified as well as the proportion of people who used at least one sample medication. The proportion of new initiators of medications were also classified as the percent who received a sample for the specific medication. Logistic regression was used to assess individual demographics, insurance, and medication characteristics associated with use.

resultsPrevalence of sample use ranged from 9.3% in 2009 to 6.2% in 2013. The most widely used sample medications included statins during 2009-2011, which changed to inhaled β-agonists in 2012-2013, as atorvastatin became available as a generic. The overall volume of the top 10 free sample medications decreased by one-third over this study period. In 2013, 12.6% of new insulin analog users and 11.0% of new oral contraceptive users receive these medications through samples. Regression analysis showed that U.S. Medicaid- and Medicare-insured persons were less likely to use samples compared to those with private insurance.

conclusionsSample medication use has decreased as generic medications are becoming more used in the U.S.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDrug IndustryDrugs, GenericFemaleHumansInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesLogistic ModelsMaleMedicaidMedicareMiddle AgedPrescription DrugsSurveys and QuestionnairesDrugs, GenericPrescription DrugsGeneric drugsPharmaceutical marketingPhysician prescribingSample medications

Identifiers

PMID26895807
PMCPMC5737018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.