Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895757›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2016

In vitro analysis of the microbiological sealing of tapered implants after mechanical cycling.

Deceles Cristina Costa Alves, Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho, Carlos Nelson Elias, Eduardo Vedovatto, Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06156111 (Bacterial Microleakage and Bone Loss in Internal Connection Dental Implants Based on the Type of Abutment Used in Zirconia Partial Fixed Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06156111 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Bacterial Microleakage and Bone Loss in Internal Connection Dental Implants Based on the Type of Abutment Used in Zirconia Partial Fixed Prosthesis: in Vivo Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Complutense de MadridRan2020 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyArmsTransepithelial abutment group, Direct to implant group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microleakage at the Different Implant Abutment Interface: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deceles Cristina Costa AlvesOral Implantology, São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Research Center, Campinas, SP, Brazil. dcca@terra.com.br.
Paulo Sérgio Perri de CarvalhoOral Implantology, São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Research Center, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Nelson EliasMaterials Science Department, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Eduardo VedovattoOral Implantology, São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Research Center, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Elizabeth Ferreira MartinezDepartment of Oral Pathology, São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Research Center, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic · BRMilitary Institute of Engineering · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior and bacterial microleakage at the implant/abutment-tapered interface following mechanical cycling. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo groups of screwless (Morse taper) implants (G1 and G2) and two groups of prosthetic screwed implants (G3 and G4) were tested. One group from each model (G2 and G4) were submitted to mechanical cycling, 500,000 cycles per sample, at a load of 120 N at 2 Hz prior to analysis. Microbiological analysis was performed via immersion of all samples in an Escherichia coli-containing suspension, incubated at 37 °C. After 14 days, the abutments were removed from their respective implants, registering the removal force (G1 and G2) or reverse torque (G3 and G4), and the presence of bacterial leakage was evaluated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to analyze the tapered surfaces of the selected samples. The Student t, binomial, and G tests were used for statistical analysis at a 5 % significance level.

resultsThe results showed no significant difference between removal force, reverse torque, and contamination values when comparing implants of the same type. However, when the four groups were compared, contamination differed significantly (p = 0.044), with G1 having the least number of contaminated samples (8.3 %). SEM analysis showed superficial defects and damage.

conclusionsThe abutment removal force or torque was not affected by mechanical cycling. Bacterial sealing of the implant/abutment tapered interface was not effective for any condition analyzed. Imprecise machining of implant parts does not allow a sufficient contact area between surfaces to provide effective sealing and prevent bacterial leakage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The microscopic gap caused by unsatisfactory implant/abutment adaptation, surface irregularities, and plastic deformation of all parts enabled bacterial contamination of the oral implants.

Indexed as

Dental LeakageDental AbutmentsDental Implant-Abutment DesignDental ImplantsDental Stress AnalysisDevice RemovalEscherichia coliIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSurface PropertiesTorqueDental ImplantsBacterial sealingMechanical cyclingTapered connection

Identifiers

PMID26895757
OpenAlexW2280643621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.