Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895454›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2016

Evolution of Clinical Pharmacy in the USA and Future Directions for Patient Care.

Barry L Carter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The evolving role of pharmacists in depression care: a scoping review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  8. Oncology pharmacy practice in the United States: Results of a comprehensive, nationwide survey.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Psychotropic stewardship: Advancing patient care.The mental health clinician · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Barry L CarterDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, Room 527, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. barry-carter@uiowa.edu.

Funding

A collaborative model to improve BP control and minimize racial disparities-CCCR01HL091841 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CARTER, BARRY L · 2009 to 2013
$4.7M
A collaborative model to improve BP control and minimize racial disparities--DCCR01HL091843 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FOSTER, ERIC D. · 2009 to 2013
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091841NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL091841NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091843NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL091843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes key events in pharmaceutical education, training, practice, and research that have occurred over the past 55 years. Some of these events included the development of the doctor of pharmacy degree, residency training, and co-location of clinical pharmacists in patient care areas. These changes not only necessitated more specialized training but then led to board certification to ensure quality patient care. Specific examples of the research that have supported the involvement of clinical pharmacists in direct patient care will be discussed.

Indexed as

CertificationHumansPatient CarePharmacistsPharmacy Service, Hospital

Identifiers

PMID26895454
PMCPMC4821736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.