Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895435›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2016

[Localized prostate cancer: Radiotherapeutic concepts].

M Grimm, F Wenz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M GrimmKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135, Mannheim, Deutschland. mario.grimm@umm.de.
F WenzKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation therapy is an established cornerstone in the treatment of prostate cancer. Significant advances in the techniques and therapeutic concepts have been made in recent decades.

objectivesThe objective of this article is to provide an overview of current standards of care and recent technical and conceptional developments.

conclusionsThree-dimensional conformal radiotherapy has long been the standard of care for percutaneous radiotherapy. The development of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) have increased the precision of treatment, thus, reducing side effects and allowing dose escalation. LDR (low dose rate) and HDR (high dose rate) brachytherapy alone or in combination are a treatment option in localized prostate cancer with a distinct side effect profile. The roles of proton therapy and stereotactic radiotherapy should be further investigated in prospective trials.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicBrachytherapyEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansMaleMedical OncologyNeoplasm StagingProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, ConformalRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeBrachytherapyProstate cancerRadiotherapy, external-beamRadiotherapy, image-guidedRadiotherapy, intensity-modulated

Identifiers

PMID26895435
OpenAlexW2413892131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.