Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895423›Full record

ReviewMolecular cell2016

RNA Processing and Genome Stability: Cause and Consequence.

Vihandha O Wickramasinghe, Ashok R Venkitaraman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of DEAD/DEAH-box helicases in immunity, infection and cancers.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dysfunction of Gpl1-Gih35-Wdr83 Complex inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vihandha O WickramasingheMedical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK. Electronic address: vw222@mrc-cu.cam.ac.uk.
Ashok R VenkitaramanMedical Research Council Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK. Electronic address: arv22@mrc-cu.cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600332Medical Research Council G1001521Medical Research Council G1001522Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is emerging that the pathways that process newly transcribed RNA molecules also regulate the response to DNA damage at multiple levels. Here, we discuss recent insights into how RNA processing pathways participate in DNA damage recognition, signaling, and repair, selectively influence the expression of genome-stabilizing proteins, and resolve deleterious DNA/RNA hybrids (R-loops) formed during transcription and RNA processing. The importance of these pathways for the DNA damage response (DDR) is underscored by the growing appreciation that defects in these regulatory connections may be connected to the genome instability involved in several human diseases, including cancer.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanGenomic InstabilityRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansRNASignal TransductionRNA

Identifiers

PMID26895423
PMCPMC5905668
OpenAlexW2283866230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.