Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895398›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The VITRO Score (Von Willebrand Factor Antigen/Thrombocyte Ratio) as a New Marker for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Comparison to Other Non-Invasive Parameters of Fibrosis Including ELF Test.

Stephanie Hametner, Arnulf Ferlitsch, Monika Ferlitsch, Alexandra Etschmaier, Rainer Schöfl, Alexander Ziachehabi, Andreas Maieron

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06694090 (Von Willebrand Factor Levels in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06694090 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Von Willebrand Factor Levels in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled67ConditionsLiver Cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. [Novel advances following the integration of Baveno VII consensus definitions for the non-invasive testing of portal hypertension].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. [Non-invasive evaluation and prediction of portal hypertension: focusing on disease progression and outcome].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie HametnerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine IV, Elisabeth Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Arnulf FerlitschDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Monika FerlitschDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra EtschmaierDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Rainer SchöflDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine IV, Elisabeth Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Alexander ZiachehabiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine IV, Elisabeth Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Andreas MaieronDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine IV, Elisabeth Hospital, Linz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), defined as hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg, causes major complications. HVPG is not always available, so a non-invasive tool to diagnose CSPH would be useful. VWF-Ag can be used to diagnose. Using the VITRO score (the VWF-Ag/platelet ratio) instead of VWF-Ag itself improves the diagnostic accuracy of detecting cirrhosis/ fibrosis in HCV patients.

aimThis study tested the diagnostic accuracy of VITRO score detecting CSPH compared to HVPG measurement.

methodsAll patients underwent HVPG testing and were categorised as CSPH or no CSPH. The following patient data were determined: CPS, D'Amico stage, VITRO score, APRI and transient elastography (TE).

resultsThe analysis included 236 patients; 170 (72%) were male, and the median age was 57.9 (35.2-76.3; 95% CI). Disease aetiology included ALD (39.4%), HCV (23.4%), NASH (12.3%), other (8.1%) and unknown (11.9%). The CPS showed 140 patients (59.3%) with CPS A; 56 (23.7%) with CPS B; and 18 (7.6%) with CPS C. 136 patients (57.6%) had compensated and 100 (42.4%) had decompensated cirrhosis; 83.9% had HVPG ≥10 mmHg. The VWF-Ag and the VITRO score increased significantly with worsening HVPG categories (P<0.0001). ROC analysis was performed for the detection of CSPH and showed AUC values of 0.92 for TE, 0.86 for VITRO score, 0.79 for VWF-Ag, 0.68 for ELF and 0.62 for APRI.

conclusionThe VITRO score is an easy way to diagnose CSPH independently of CPS in routine clinical work and may improve the management of patients with cirrhosis.

Indexed as

Platelet CountAgedBiomarkersElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansHypertension, PortalLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedROC Curvevon Willebrand FactorBiomarkersvon Willebrand Factor

Identifiers

PMID26895398
PMCPMC4760704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.