ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2016
Functional evaluation of an iridotomy in primary angle closure eyes.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined phacogoniosynechialysis with viscocanalostomy and Ologen implant for the management of primary angle-closure glaucoma: a retrospective cohort pilot study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors of ocular hypertension: a case-control study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Lasers in glaucoma.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018Review
- Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and ultrasonographic parameters in eyes with phacomorphic glaucoma and eyes with mature cataract.International ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Water-drinking Test and Pharmacologic Mydriasis as Provocative Tests in Primary Angle Closure Suspects.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the functional efficacy of an iridotomy in primary angle closure (PAC) eyes by measuring IOP responses to provocative tests before and after iridotomy.
designProspective cohort study. SUBJECTS: 50 consecutive adult patients, 40-60 years of age, having primary angle closure.
methodsClinical examination, perimetry, biometry and ultrasound biomicroscopy of the angle were done. A darkroom prone provocative test (DRPPT), a mydriatic test and a Valsalva maneuver were performed before and after the iridotomy.
main outcome measuresIOP change in response to the provocative tests before and after iridotomy, and correlation with baseline parameters.
resultsIOP at baseline and after iridotomy was 14.4 ± 2.7 mmHg and 14.3 ± 2.6 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.)83. There was no significant change on diurnal phasing before and after an iridotomy (p = 0.)11. The mean IOP rise was 5.9 ± 3.7 mmHg on the DRPPT, 4.3 ± 3.5 mmHg on the Mydriatic test and 9.1 ± 4.9 mmHg on the Valsalva maneuver, and was reduced significantly to 3.2 ± 2.1 mmHg, 2.3 ± 1.8 and 6.4 ± 3.5, respectively(p < 0.001 for all tests). The decrease in pupillary block component for all 50 eyes was 46.5 % for the mydriatic test, 45.8 % for the DRPPT and 29.7 % for the Valsalva maneuver. PAC eyes positive on the DRPPT and mydriatic test prior to an iridotomy became negative after laser iridotomy in 75.9 and 84.6 % eyes, respectively, but on the Valsalva maneuver, only 23.8 % became negative. After iridotomy, eyes that continued to be positive on the mydriatic test had a significantly thicker lens (p = 0.02), decreased TCPD (p = 0.014) and narrower trabecular-iris angle (p = 0.048). On the DRPPT, they had a thicker lens (p = 0.03), shorter iris thickness (p = 0.025) and TCPD (p = 0.032), and on the Valsalva maneuver, they had a narrower scleral-ciliary process angle (SCPA; p = 0.019) and shorter TCPD (p = 0.015).
conclusionsThis comprehensive functional evaluation of laser iridotomy in early PAC eyes showed a significant reduction in the pupillary block component of IOP response to provocative testing, possibly decreasing IOP fluctuations over time. An iridotomy does not, however, significantly change mean IOP or diurnal phasing of IOP in PAC eyes. Eyes with a very narrow angle or a thick lens may continue to have angle closure due to other pathomechanisms for angle closure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.