Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895072›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Percutaneous Vaccination as an Effective Method of Delivery of MVA and MVA-Vectored Vaccines.

Clement A Meseda, Vajini Atukorale, Jordan Kuhn, Falko Schmeisser, Jerry P Weir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clement A MesedaDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, United States of America.
Vajini AtukoraleDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, United States of America.
Jordan KuhnDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, United States of America.
Falko SchmeisserDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, United States of America.
Jerry P WeirDivision of Viral Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, United States of America.
United States Food and Drug Administration · USCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The robustness of immune responses to an antigen could be dictated by the route of vaccine inoculation. Traditional smallpox vaccines, essentially vaccinia virus strains, that were used in the eradication of smallpox were administered by percutaneous inoculation (skin scarification). The modified vaccinia virus Ankara is licensed as a smallpox vaccine in Europe and Canada and currently undergoing clinical development in the United States. MVA is also being investigated as a vector for the delivery of heterologous genes for prophylactic or therapeutic immunization. Since MVA is replication-deficient, MVA and MVA-vectored vaccines are often inoculated through the intramuscular, intradermal or subcutaneous routes. Vaccine inoculation via the intramuscular, intradermal or subcutaneous routes requires the use of injection needles, and an estimated 10 to 20% of the population of the United States has needle phobia. Following an observation in our laboratory that a replication-deficient recombinant vaccinia virus derived from the New York City Board of Health strain elicited protective immune responses in a mouse model upon inoculation by tail scarification, we investigated whether MVA and MVA recombinants can elicit protective responses following percutaneous administration in mouse models. Our data suggest that MVA administered by percutaneous inoculation, elicited vaccinia-specific antibody responses, and protected mice from lethal vaccinia virus challenge, at levels comparable to or better than subcutaneous or intramuscular inoculation. High titers of specific neutralizing antibodies were elicited in mice inoculated with a recombinant MVA expressing the herpes simplex type 2 glycoprotein D after scarification. Similarly, a recombinant MVA expressing the hemagglutinin of attenuated influenza virus rgA/Viet Nam/1203/2004 (H5N1) elicited protective immune responses when administered at low doses by scarification. Taken together, our data suggest that MVA and MVA-vectored vaccines inoculated by scarification can elicit protective immune responses that are comparable to subcutaneous vaccination, and may allow for antigen sparing when vaccine supply is limited.

Indexed as

VaccinationAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalGenetic VectorsHerpes Simplex Virus VaccinesHerpesvirus 2, HumanImmunoglobulin GInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeMiceVaccines, DNAVacciniaVaccinia virusViral VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCytokinesHerpes Simplex Virus VaccinesImmunoglobulin GMVA vaccineVaccines, DNAViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26895072
PMCPMC4760941
OpenAlexW2274649279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.