Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26895001›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2016

Estimated Maximal Safe Dosages of Tumescent Lidocaine.

Jeffrey A Klein, Daniel R Jeske

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readControlled Clinical TrialVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03226626 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Tumescent Anesthesia Antibiotic Delivery (TAAD) and SubQKath for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, Thrombosis and Sepsis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHK Surgical, Inc.Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled330ConditionsSurgical Site Infection, Thrombosis, SepsisArmsTumescent Anesthesia and antibiotic delivery (TAAD) plus IVAD, SubQKath
NCT04733781 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Subcutaneous Injection of Large Volumes of Tumescent Lidocaine and Epinephrine (TLE) by Laypersons: a Double-blind, Non-inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJeffrey Alan Klein, MDRan2021 to 2021Enrolled36ConditionsVenomous Snakebites, Local Anesthesia, Painless Injection, Regional AnesthesiaArmsTumescent Lidocaine and Epinephrine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Large-Volume Breast Autologous Fat Transfer Entirely Under Tumescent Anesthesia: Experience With 87 Patients Over 6 Years.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Wide-Awake Olecranon Fracture Fixation: Is it Possible?Journal of hand surgery global online · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeffrey A KleinFrom the *Department of Dermatology, University of California, Irvine, Medical Sciences, Irvine, California; and †Department of Statistics, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California.
Daniel R Jeske

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumescent lidocaine anesthesia consists of subcutaneous injection of relatively large volumes (up to 4 L or more) of dilute lidocaine (≤1 g/L) and epinephrine (≤1 mg/L). Although tumescent lidocaine anesthesia is used for an increasing variety of surgical procedures, the maximum safe dosage is unknown. Our primary aim in this study was to measure serum lidocaine concentrations after subcutaneous administration of tumescent lidocaine with and without liposuction. Our hypotheses were that even with large doses (i.e., >30 mg/kg), serum lidocaine concentrations would be below levels associated with mild toxicity and that the concentration-time profile would be lower after liposuction than without liposuction.

methodsVolunteers participated in 1 to 2 infiltration studies without liposuction and then one study with tumescent liposuction totally by local anesthesia. Serum lidocaine concentrations were measured at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 24 hours after each tumescent lidocaine infiltration. Area under the curve (AUC∞) of the serum lidocaine concentration-time profiles and peak serum lidocaine concentrations (Cmax) were determined with and without liposuction. For any given milligram per kilogram dosage, the probability that Cmax >6 μg/mL, the threshold for mild lidocaine toxicity was estimated using tolerance interval analysis.

resultsIn 41 tumescent infiltration procedures among 14 volunteer subjects, tumescent lidocaine dosages ranged from 19.2 to 52 mg/kg. Measured serum lidocaine concentrations were all <6 μg/mL over the 24-hour study period. AUC∞s with liposuction were significantly less than those without liposuction (P = 0.001). The estimated risk of lidocaine toxicity without liposuction at a dose of 28 mg/kg and with liposuction at a dose of 45 mg/kg was ≤1 per 2000.

conclusionsPreliminary estimates for maximum safe dosages of tumescent lidocaine are 28 mg/kg without liposuction and 45 mg/kg with liposuction. As a result of delayed systemic absorption, these dosages yield serum lidocaine concentrations below levels associated with mild toxicity and are a nonsignificant risk of harm to patients.

Indexed as

LipectomyAdrenergic AgonistsAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalArea Under CurveCaliforniaDrug CombinationsDrug MonitoringEpinephrineHeart RateHumansInjections, SubcutaneousLidocaineMetabolic Clearance RatePatient SafetyRisk AssessmentAdrenergic AgonistsAnesthetics, LocalDrug CombinationsEpinephrineLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID26895001
PMCPMC4830750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.