Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26894674›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2016

Fitmunk: improving protein structures by accurate, automatic modeling of side-chain conformations.

Przemyslaw Jerzy Porebski, Marcin Cymborowski, Marta Pasenkiewicz-Gierula, Wladek Minor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optimal structure determination from sub-optimal diffraction data.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  3. IUCrJ · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sequence assignment for low-resolution modelling of protein crystal structures.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Databases, Repositories, and Other Data Resources in Structural Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Przemyslaw Jerzy PorebskiDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Jordan Hall, 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Marcin CymborowskiDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Jordan Hall, 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Marta Pasenkiewicz-GierulaFaculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, ul. Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
Wladek MinorDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Jordan Hall, 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY OF MACROMOLECULESR01GM053163 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MINOR, WLADEK, OTWINOWSKI, ZBYSZEK · 1996 to 2014
$6.3M
Integrated resource for reproducibility in macromolecular crystallographyU01HG008424 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MINOR, WLADEK · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
X-ray data analysis in the presence of structural variability - Administrative SupplementR01GM117080 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MINOR, WLADEK, OTWINOWSKI, ZBYSZEK · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG008424NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008424NIGMS NIH HHS GM053163NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053163NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in crystallographic hardware and software have allowed automated structure-solution pipelines to approach a near-`one-click' experience for the initial determination of macromolecular structures. However, in many cases the resulting initial model requires a laborious, iterative process of refinement and validation. A new method has been developed for the automatic modeling of side-chain conformations that takes advantage of rotamer-prediction methods in a crystallographic context. The algorithm, which is based on deterministic dead-end elimination (DEE) theory, uses new dense conformer libraries and a hybrid energy function derived from experimental data and prior information about rotamer frequencies to find the optimal conformation of each side chain. In contrast to existing methods, which incorporate the electron-density term into protein-modeling frameworks, the proposed algorithm is designed to take advantage of the highly discriminatory nature of electron-density maps. This method has been implemented in the program Fitmunk, which uses extensive conformational sampling. This improves the accuracy of the modeling and makes it a versatile tool for crystallographic model building, refinement and validation. Fitmunk was extensively tested on over 115 new structures, as well as a subset of 1100 structures from the PDB. It is demonstrated that the ability of Fitmunk to model more than 95% of side chains accurately is beneficial for improving the quality of crystallographic protein models, especially at medium and low resolutions. Fitmunk can be used for model validation of existing structures and as a tool to assess whether side chains are modeled optimally or could be better fitted into electron density. Fitmunk is available as a web service at http://kniahini.med.virginia.edu/fitmunk/server/ or at http://fitmunk.bitbucket.org/.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularSoftwareAmino Acid MotifsAmino AcidsProteinsAmino AcidsProteinsautomationrefinementside-chain fittingstructure buildingvalidation

Identifiers

PMID26894674
PMCPMC4756610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.