Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26894297›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Assessment of Point-of-Care Diagnostics for G6PD Deficiency in Malaria Endemic Rural Eastern Indonesia.

Ari W Satyagraha, Arkasha Sadhewa, Rosalie Elvira, Iqbal Elyazar, Denny Feriandika, Ungke Antonjaya, Damian Oyong, Decy Subekti, Ismail E Rozi, Gonzalo J Domingo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. No G6PD A- (G202A) variant detected amongMalariaWorld journal · 2026
    Article
  6. Mapping anemia prevalence across Indonesia.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 8-Aminoquinoline Therapy for Latent Malaria.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ari W SatyagrahaEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Arkasha SadhewaEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rosalie ElviraEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Iqbal ElyazarEijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Denny FeriandikaEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ungke AntonjayaEijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Damian OyongEijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Decy SubektiEijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ismail E RoziEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Gonzalo J DomingoPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Alida R HarahapEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
J Kevin BairdEijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology · IDOxford University Clinical Research Unit IndonesiaProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients infected by Plasmodium vivax or Plasmodium ovale suffer repeated clinical attacks without primaquine therapy against latent stages in liver. Primaquine causes seriously threatening acute hemolytic anemia in patients having inherited glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Access to safe primaquine therapy hinges upon the ability to confirm G6PD normal status. CareStart G6PD, a qualitative G6PD rapid diagnostic test (G6PD RDT) intended for use at point-of-care in impoverished rural settings where most malaria patients live, was evaluated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis device and the standard qualitative fluorescent spot test (FST) were each compared against the quantitative spectrophotometric assay for G6PD activity as the diagnostic gold standard. The assessment occurred at meso-endemic Panenggo Ede in western Sumba Island in eastern Indonesia, where 610 residents provided venous blood. The G6PD RDT and FST qualitative assessments were performed in the field, whereas the quantitative assay was performed in a research laboratory at Jakarta. The median G6PD activity ≥ 5 U/gHb was 9.7 U/gHb and was considered 100% of normal activity. The prevalence of G6PD deficiency by quantitative assessment (<5 U/gHb) was 7.2%. Applying 30% of normal G6PD activity as the cut-off for qualitative testing, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for G6PD RDT versus FST among males were as follows: 100%, 98.7%, 89%, and 100% versus 91.7%, 92%, 55%, and 99%; P = 0.49, 0.001, 0.004, and 0.24, respectively. These values among females were: 83%, 92.7%, 17%, and 99.7% versus 100%, 92%, 18%, and 100%; P = 1.0, 0.89, 1.0 and 1.0, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The overall performance of G6PD RDT, especially 100% negative predictive value, demonstrates suitable safety for G6PD screening prior to administering hemolytic drugs like primaquine and many others. Relatively poor diagnostic performance among females due to mosaic G6PD phenotype is an inherent limitation of any current practical screening methodology.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase DeficiencyHumansIndonesiaMalariaMalePoint-of-Care SystemsRural HealthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26894297
PMCPMC4760930
OpenAlexW2281646250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.