ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016
Clinical Evaluation of Low Level Diode Laser Application For Primary Teeth Pulpotomy.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of diode laser in pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of diode laser for pulpotomy in primary teeth: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing the efficacy of Laser pulpotomy versus conventional pulpotomy in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.Lasers in medical science · 2024Pooled it
- Laser pulpotomy-an effective alternative to conventional techniques-a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2018Pooled it
- Clinical and radiographic outcomes of laser pulpotomy in vital primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2018Pooled it
- Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Clinical and radiographic effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) partial pulpotomy with low power or high power diode laser irradiation in deciduous molars: a randomized clinical trial.Lasers in medical science · 2022Trial
- Laser Pulpotomies' Clinical and Radiographic Success in Primary Teeth by Type of Laser.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of Diode Lasers as an Adjunct in Pulpotomy Procedures Involving Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Laser Pulpotomy vs. Conventional Vital Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth: A Comparative Clinical Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Efficacy of Low-level Laser Therapy and Formocresol as Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024Article
- The application of lasers in vital pulp therapy: clinical and radiographic outcomes.BMC oral health · 2024Review
- Diode Laser-Assisted Pulp Polyp Excision and Canal Disinfection in a Primary Molar: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Photobiomodulation effect of red LED (630 nm) on the free radical levels produced by pulp cells under stress conditions.Lasers in medical science · 2022Article
- Article
- Outcome comparison between diode laser pulpotomy and formocresol pulpotomy on human primary molars.Journal of dental sciences · 2020Article
- Different Pulp Dressing Materials for the Pulpotomy of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Biological effects of low-level laser irradiation (LLLI) on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED).Clinical oral investigations · 2020Article
- Clinical and radiographic evaluation of diode laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth.Laser therapy · 2018Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Low-level Diode Laser and Electrosurgical Pulpotomy in Primary Molars.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInspite of latest advances in the materials and techniques practiced for the treatment of pulpally infected teeth with better reported success rate, still the question arises for safety and effectiveness of these medicaments.
aimThe objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of the Low Level Laser Therapy to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) when used for pulpotomy in vital human primary molars. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe sample consisted of 40 primary molars from 29 children aged four to seven years. The teeth were selected based on clinical, radiographic criteria and randomly allocated to two groups. All the 40 primary molars were subjected to standard pulpotomy procedure, where in 20 molars received MTA (Group I) and 20 molars received LLLT (Group II) pulpotomy. Children were recalled at 3, 6 and 12 months intervals and pulpotomised molars were examined clinically and radiographically. Data was analysed using chi-square test.
resultsMTA showed 94.7% success rate at all the three intervals, where as LLLT showed a success of 95% at three months, which decreased gradually to 85% at six months and 80% at 12 months. Intergroup comparisons were not significant.
conclusionLow level laser therapy can be considered for primary teeth pulpotomy and its success is comparable to MTA pulpotomy technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.