Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26894125›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Trends of Various Techniques of Tubectomy: A Five Year Study in a Tertiary Institute.

Kavita Mahadevappa, Naveen Prasanna, Ramalingappa Antartani Channabasappa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kavita MahadevappaAssistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Science (KIMS) , Hubli, Karnataka, India .
Naveen PrasannaAssistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Science (KIMS) , Hubli, Karnataka, India .
Ramalingappa Antartani ChannabasappaProfessor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Science (KIMS) , Hubli, Karnataka, India .
Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFemale sterilization is one of the best and effective methods of contraception for women who have completed their family. Tubectomy during caesarean operation and minilaparotomy are popular methods in developing countries whereas laparoscopic sterilization and hysteroscopic tubal occlusion are the preferred methods in developed countries.

aimTo know the trends, incidence and immediate complications of methods of female sterilizations performed at our institute. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a retrospective analytical study conducted at our tertiary care centre from January 2010 to December 2014 in Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka. The case files of all the patients who underwent sterilization were taken from the medical records section and reviewed in detail. The cases were grouped as caesarean tubectomy, minilaparotomy and laparoscopic sterilization, based on the abdominal entry. For minilaparotomy and during caesarean tubectomy, modified pomeroy's technique was used. For laparoscopic sterilization, falope rings were used. Data was analysed by Karl Pearson's correlation co-efficient method and Chi-Square test. The p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsOut of 5442 cases of female sterilization, 2872 underwent caesarean tubectomy, remaining half underwent minilaparotomy (1306) and laparoscopic sterilization (1264). Sterilizations were significantly more during puerperal period (caesarean tubectomy + post abortal + postpartum) compared to interval period. There was an increasing trend in caesarean tubectomy and laparoscopic sterilization. There were 11 procedure related complications in the laparoscopic sterilization, one in caesarean tubectomy and none in minilaparotomy. Two deaths were reported in minilaparotomy, one in laparoscopic sterilization and four in the caesarean tubectomy, which were due to septicaemia.

conclusionAn increasing trend in caesarean tubectomy and laparoscopic sterilization is seen in this study. Female sterilization should be individualized based on the timing, place and surgeons experience. Sepsis is a major cause of death and asepsis could be compromised when female sterilization is done in large numbers in camps. Hence target related approach towards female sterilization should be avoided. Laparoscopic sterilization has more procedure related complications, which can be better handled in tertiary care centres.

Indexed as

Caesarean tubectomyLaparoscopic sterilizationMinilaparotomyPostpartum

Identifiers

PMID26894125
PMCPMC4740653
OpenAlexW2411215335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.