Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26894090›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Comparison of Flow and Volume Incentive Spirometry on Pulmonary Function and Exercise Tolerance in Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Amaravadi Sampath Kumar, Gopala Krishna Alaparthi, Alfred Joseph Augustine, Zulfeequer Chundaanveetil Pazhyaottayil, Anand Ramakrishna, Shyam Krishnan Krishnakumar

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04716166 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Compare the Effects of Volume-oriented Versus Flow-oriented Incentive Spirometry on Pulmonary Function and Functional Capacity in Patients of Upper Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsCholecystitis, Perforated Duodenal Ulcer, Diaphragmatic Hernia, Benign Pancreas TumorArmsVolume-oriented incentive spirometry, Flow-oriented incentive spirometry
NCT06255327 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of The "I Cough" Care Program to Dyspnea, Respiratory Parameters, Mobility and Pain After Major Abdominal Surgery.

TypeinterventionalSponsorYeditepe UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsDyspnea, Pain, Respiratory Insufficiency, Mobility LimitationArmsI COUGH care program
NCT07365163 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Deep Breathing Exercises and Volume-oriented Incentive Spirometry on Dyspnea, Functional Endurance, and Pulmonary Function During the Third Trimester of Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LahoreRan2025 to 2025Enrolled36ConditionsDyspnea During Pregnancy, Physiological Changes in Pregnancy, Reduced Functional EnduranceArmsDeep Breathing Exercises, Volume-Oriented Incentive Spirometry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Preoperative Respiratory Training Before Cardiac Surgery: Feasibility and Longitudinal Pulmonary Function Changes in Elderly Patients.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Incentive Spirometer in COVID-19: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amaravadi Sampath KumarLecturer, Department of Physiotherapy, Father Muller Medical College Hospital , RGUHS, India .
Gopala Krishna AlaparthiAssociate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , India .
Alfred Joseph AugustineProfessor, Department of Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , India .
Zulfeequer Chundaanveetil PazhyaottayilAssistant Professor, Senior Scale, Department of Physiotherapy, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , India .
Anand RamakrishnaAssociate Dean and Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , India .
Shyam Krishnan KrishnakumarAssistant Professor, Senior Scale, Department of Physiotherapy, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , India .
Father Muller Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical procedures in abdominal area lead to changes in pulmonary function, respiratory mechanics and impaired physical capacity leading to postoperative pulmonary complications, which can affect up to 80% of upper abdominal surgery.

aimTo evaluate the effects of flow and volume incentive spirometry on pulmonary function and exercise tolerance in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsA randomized clinical trial was conducted in a hospital of Mangalore city in Southern India. Thirty-seven males and thirteen females who were undergoing abdominal surgeries were included and allocated into flow and volume incentive spirometry groups by block randomization. All subjects underwent evaluations of pulmonary function with measurement of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1), Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF). Preoperative and postoperative measurements were taken up to day 5 for both groups. Exercise tolerance measured by Six- Minute Walk Test during preoperative period and measured again at the time of discharge for both groups. Pulmonary function was analysed by post-hoc analysis and carried out using Bonferroni's 't'-test. Exercise tolerance was analysed by Paired 'T'-test.

resultsPulmonary function (FVC, FEV1, and PEFR) was found to be significantly decreased in 1(st), 2(nd) and 3(rd) postoperative day when compared with preoperative day. On 4(th) and 5(th) postoperative day the pulmonary function (FVC, FEV1, and PEFR) was found to be better preserved in both flow and volume incentive spirometry groups. The Six-Minute Walk Test showed a statistically significant improvement in pulmonary function on the day of discharge than in the preoperative period. In terms of distance covered, the volume- incentive spirometry group showed a greater statistically significant improvement from the preoperative period to the time of discharge than was exhibited by the flow incentive spirometry group.

conclusionFlow and volume incentive spirometry can be safely recommended to patients undergoing open abdominal surgery as there have been no adverse events recorded. Also, these led to a demonstrable improvement in pulmonary function and exercise tolerance.

Indexed as

Incentive spirometerLaparotomyLung function testSix-Minute Walk Test

Identifiers

PMID26894090
PMCPMC4740618
OpenAlexW2231333616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.