ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2016
Curative effect of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent uterine sarcoma.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secondary cytoreductive surgery potentially improves the oncological outcomes of patients with recurrent uterine sarcomas.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2018Article
- Animal Models for Tuberculosis in Translational and Precision Medicine.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
- Trabectedin and Radiotherapy in Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: A Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of bevacizumab (BEV) combined with chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent uterine sarcoma. The clinical data of 4 patients with advanced or recurrenct uterine sarcoma, who received treatment with BEV combined with chemotherapy in our hospital between May, 2006 and May, 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. We estimated the chemotherapy response rate [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)], clinical benefit rate [CR + PR+ stable disease (SD)], progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and evaluated treatment safety and toxicity reactions. Of the 4 patients, 1 achieved CR, with a disease-free survival time of 96 months; 1 achieved PR, with a PFS of 13 months and an OS of 25 months; 1 achieved SD, with a PFS of 9 months and an OS of 24 months; and 1 developed progressive disease, with a PFS of 3 months and an OS of 9 months. The response rate (CR+PR) was 50%, and the clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) was 75%. Treatment-related adverse reactions occurred in all 4 patients, including bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal reactions. Of the 4 patients, 1 developed grade 4 bone marrow suppression (thrombocytopenia), whereas the remaining 3 patients developed grade 2 bone marrow suppression (leukopenia). Of the 4 cases, 2 developed grade 2 gastrointestinal reactions, and the remaining 2 patients grade 1 gastrointestinal reactions. Therefore, BEV combined with chemotherapy was able to effectively control advanced or recurrent uterine sarcoma, was well-tolerated, and is considered to be a safe and effective candidate treatment for this type of tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.