ArticleBMJ quality & safety2016
Balancing stakeholder needs in the evaluation of healthcare quality improvement.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stakeholder engagement in healthcare research in India - A systematic review.Health research policy and systems · 2025Pooled it
- Care programs and their components for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review.Respiratory research · 2021Pooled it
- Effects on health and process outcomes of physiotherapist-led orthopaedic triage for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of comparative studies.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Bringing evolutionary cancer therapy to the clinic: a systems approach.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Review
- Factors associated with successful implementation of Clean Cut: a perioperative surgical site infection prevention quality improvement programme-a cohort study of low-resource hospitals.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Designing the community training hub pilot as a model for multidisciplinary workforce development.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Quality improvement project demonstrating a sustained increase in the assessment and sampling of ascites for hospitalised patients with cirrhosis.Frontline gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of an early operating room start time in managing pediatric trauma.World journal of orthopedics · 2023Article
- Reporting unit context data to stakeholders in long-term care: a practical approach.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Factors Associated With Medical Staff's Engagement and Perception of a Quality Improvement Program for Acute Coronary Syndromes in Hospitals: A Nationally Representative Mixed-Methods Study in China.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Nurses' roles in changing practice through implementing best practices: A systematic review.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2022Review
- Lessons learned during implementation of MR-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids.Insights into imaging · 2021Article
- Stakeholder engagement in the health policy process in a low income country: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of the challenges to effective inclusion in Malawi.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Music Therapy and Nursing Cotreatment in Integrative Hospice and Palliative Care.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2021Article
- Article
- Promoting Intersectoral Collaboration Through the Evaluations of Public Health Interventions: Insights From Key Informants in 6 European Countries.International journal of health policy and management · 2021Article
- Implementing essential interventions for cardiovascular disease risk management in primary healthcare: lessons from Eastern Europe and Central Asia.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Multiple Perspectives Analysis of the Implementation of an Integrated Care Model for Older Adults in Quebec.International journal of integrated care · 2019Article
- Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective.Primary health care research & development · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality improvement (QI) efforts affect a broader range of people than we often assume. These are the potential stakeholders for QI and its evaluation, and they have valuable perspectives to offer when they are consulted in planning, conducting and interpreting evaluations. QI practitioners are accustomed to consulting stakeholders to assess unintended consequences or assess patient experiences of care, but in many cases there are additional benefits to a broad inclusion of stakeholders. These benefits are better adherence to ethical standards, to assure that all legitimate interests take part, more useful and relevant evaluation information and better political buy-in to improve impact. Balancing various stakeholder needs for information requires skill for both politics and research management. These challenges have few pat answers, but several preferred practices, which are illustrated with practical examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.