Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26893135›Full record

Trial reportPharmacotherapy2016

Evaluation of Pharmacists' Work in a Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Model for the Management of Hypertension.

Brian J Isetts, Daniel E Buffington, Barry L Carter, Marie Smith, Linnea A Polgreen, Paul A James

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmacotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pharmacist services for non-hospitalised patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Evolution of Drug Information Services to Asynchronous Delivery of Pharmacist eConsults.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian J IsettsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care & Health Systems, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Daniel E BuffingtonCollege of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Barry L CarterThe Patrick E. Keefe Professor in Pharmacy, The Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science College of Pharmacy, and Professor, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Marie SmithHenry A. Palmer, Professor at the University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut.
Linnea A PolgreenDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Paul A JamesThe Donald J. and Anna M. Ottilie Chair and Professor in the Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Funding

A collaborative model to improve BP control and minimize racial disparities-CCCR01HL091841 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CARTER, BARRY L · 2009 to 2013
$4.7M
A collaborative model to improve BP control and minimize racial disparities--DCCR01HL091843 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FOSTER, ERIC D. · 2009 to 2013
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091841NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL091841NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091843NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL091843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivePhysician-pharmacist collaborative models have been shown to improve the care of patients with numerous chronic medical conditions. Team-based health care using integrated clinical pharmacists provides one opportunity to improve quality in health care systems that use population-based financing. In November 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requested that the relative value of pharmacists' work in team-based care needs to be established. Thus the objective of this study was to describe the components of pharmacists' work in the management of hypertension with a physician-pharmacist collaborative model.

designDescriptive analysis of the components of pharmacists' work in the Collaboration Among Pharmacists and Physicians to Improve Outcomes Now (CAPTION) study, a prospective, cluster randomized trial. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThis analysis was intended to provide policymakers with data and information, using the CAPTION study model, on the time and intensity of pharmacists' work to understand pharmacists' relative value contributions in the context of CMS financing and population management aims. The CAPTION trial was conducted in 32 community-based medical offices in 15 U.S. states and included 390 patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Blood pressure was measured by trained study coordinators in each office, and patients were included in the study if they had uncontrolled blood pressure. Included patients were randomized to a 9-month intervention, a 24-month intervention, or usual care. The goal of the pharmacist intervention was to improve blood pressure control and resolve drug therapy problems impeding progress toward blood pressure goals. This intervention included medical record review, a structured assessment with the patient, collaboration to achieve goals of therapy, and patient follow-up. The two intervention arms (9 and 24 mo) were identical the first 9 months, and that time frame is the focus of this workload evaluation. Pharmacists completed study encounter forms for every patient encounter and estimated time spent in pre-visit, face-to-face care, and post-visit activities. Among the 390 patients, there were 2811 encounters with pharmacists that involved 3.44 hours/patient for face-to-face care visits plus 1.55 hours/patient for pre-visit and post-visit work. Intensity of work was reflected in interventions to resolve drug therapy problems with patients (43% of encounters) and with physicians (1169 recommendations, of which physicians accepted 1153 [98.6%]), resulting in improvement of patients' blood pressure goals achieved (from 0% at baseline to 43% at 9 months based on the primary study end point).

conclusionPharmacists provided extensive interventions to patients with hypertension. This analysis provides a framework for health systems, provider groups, and payers to measure pharmacists' work in value-based financing and population management.

Indexed as

Intersectoral CollaborationPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CarePharmacistsPhysicians, Primary CareAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Combined Modality TherapyCosts and Cost AnalysisDrug MonitoringFemaleHealth Care CostsHealthy LifestyleHumansAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressure controlhypertension managementpharmacist management

Identifiers

PMID26893135
PMCPMC4838520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.