ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2016
The Affordable Care Act and Diabetes Diagnosis and Care: Exploring the Potential Impacts.
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations:Diabetes care · 2020Guideline
- Enrollment Assister Perspectives of a Private Health Insurance Program for Undocumented Immigrants.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Pre-Type 1 Diabetes in Adolescents and Teens: Screening, Nutritional Interventions, Beta-Cell Preservation, and Psychosocial Impacts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- Trends in cardiometabolic multimorbidity in non-elderly adult Medicaid enrollees, 2018-2022.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2025Article
- 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.Diabetes care · 2024Review
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Glycemic Control Among Insured US Adults.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- Determinants of Diabetes Disease Management, 2011-2019.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Twenty years of pediatric diabetes surveillance: what do we know and why it matters.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2021Review
- Trends in Prevalence of Diabetes and Control of Risk Factors in Diabetes Among US Adults, 1999-2018.JAMA · 2021Article
- Reply to Q. Chu et al.JCO global oncology · 2021Article
- Impact of Expanded Medicaid Eligibility on the Diabetes Continuum of Care Among Low-Income Adults: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021Article
- Coverage for Adults With Chronic Disease Under the First 5 Years of the Affordable Care Act.Medical care · 2020Article
- The Affordable Care Act: Effects of Insurance on Diabetes Biomarkers.Diabetes care · 2020Observational
- Disparities in Biomarkers for Patients With Diabetes After the Affordable Care Act.Medical care · 2020Article
- The Impact of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion on Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis and Treatment: A National Survey of Physicians.Journal of community health · 2019Article
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health Insurance and Differences in Visit Type for a Population of Patients with Diabetes after Medicaid Expansion.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2019Article
- Advancing Health Policy and Program Research in Diabetes: Findings from the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Network.Current diabetes reports · 2018Review
- Medicaid Eligibility Expansions May Address Gaps In Access To Diabetes Medications.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article reviews available data on the implications of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for the diagnosis and care of type 2 diabetes. We provide a general overview of the major issues for diabetes diagnosis and care, and describe the policies in the ACA that affect diabetes diagnosis and care. We also estimate that approximately 2.3 million of the 4.6 million people in the USA with undiagnosed diabetes aged 18-64 in 2009-2010 may have gained access to free preventive care under the ACA, which could increase diabetes detection. In addition, we note two factors that may limit the success of the ACA for improving access to diabetes care. First, many states with the highest diabetes prevalence have not expanded Medicaid eligibility, and second, primary care providers may not adequately meet the increase in Medicaid patients because federal funding to increase provider reimbursement for Medicaid visits recently expired. We close by discussing current gaps in the literature and future directions for research on the ACA's impact on diabetes diagnosis, care, and health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.