Trial reportThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2016
Short-term venlafaxine v. lithium monotherapy for bipolar type II major depressive episodes: effectiveness and mood conversion rate.
Trial report in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Second-Generation Antidepressant Monotherapy for Acute Bipolar-II Depression.Psychopharmacology bulletin · 2025Pooled it
- Lithium treatment of Bipolar disorder in adults: A systematic review of randomized trials and meta-analyses.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- The CINP Guidelines on the Definition and Evidence-Based Interventions for Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Disorder.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder.Bipolar disorders · 2018Guideline
- Step-wise loss of antidepressant effectiveness with repeated antidepressant trials in bipolar II depression.Bipolar disorders · 2016Trial
- Rapid versus non-rapid cycling bipolar II depression: response to venlafaxine and lithium and hypomanic risk.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2016Trial
- Article
- Treatment of bipolar depression: clinical practice vs. adherence to guidelines-data from a Bavarian drug surveillance project.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Bipolar II Disorder: Understudied and Underdiagnosed.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2023Review
- Differential characteristics of bipolar I and II disorders: a retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of clinical features, illness course, and response to treatment.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2023Article
- Pharmacological Strategies for Bipolar Disorders in Acute Phases and Chronic Management with a Special Focus on Lithium, Valproic Acid, and Atypical Antipsychotics.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Article
- Neglected but not negligible aspects of antidepressants and their availability in bipolar depression.Brain and behavior · 2021Review
- Acute and Maintenance Treatment of Bipolar Depression.Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2021Review
- Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus.Bipolar disorders · 2020Article
- Antidepressants in bipolar depression: an enduring controversy.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2018Review
- Antidepressants and Mood Stabilizers: Novel Research Avenues and Clinical Insights for Bipolar Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Comparison of treatment outcome using two definitions of rapid cycling in subjects with bipolar II disorder.Bipolar disorders · 2017Article
- Bipolar Disorder and Population Health.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundControversy exists over antidepressant use in bipolar II depression.
aimsTo compare the safety and effectiveness of antidepressantv.mood stabiliser monotherapy for bipolar type II major depressive episodes.
methodRandomised, double-blind, parallel-group, 12-week comparison of venlafaxine (n= 65)v.lithium (n= 64) monotherapy in adult out-patients (trial registration numberNCT00602537).
resultsPrimary outcome - venlafaxine produced a greater response rate (67.7%)v lithium (34.4%,P<0.001). Secondary outcomes - venlafaxine produced a greater remission rate (58.5%v 28.1%,P<0.001); greater decline in depression symptom scores over time (β = -5.32, s.e. = 1.16, χ(2)= 21.19,P<0.001); greater reduction in global severity scores over time (β = -1.05, s.e. = 0.22, w(2)= 22.33,P<0.001); and greater improvement in global change scores (β = -1.31, s.e. = 0.32, χ(2)= 16.95,P<0.001) relative to lithium. No statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in hypomanic symptoms were observed between treatments.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that short-term venlafaxine monotherapy may provide effective antidepressant treatment for bipolar II depression without a statistically significant increase in hypomanic symptoms relative to lithium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.