Trial reportDrugs in R&D2016
Dabigatran Versus Warfarin After Bioprosthesis Valve Replacement for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Postoperatively: DAWA Pilot Study.
Trial report in Drugs in R&D, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dabigatran Versus Warfarin After Mitral and Aortic Bioprosthesis Replacement for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Postoperatively: Pilot Study
Evaluation of Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Bileaflet Mechanical Valves in Mitral Position Before and After Rivaroxaban Use: RMV Study
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Compared with Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Type 2 Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with a left-sided bioprosthetic heart valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in bioprosthetic valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Pooled it
- An Updated Meta-Analysis of DOACs vs. VKAs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Bioprosthetic Heart Valve.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Off-label Use for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Valvular Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Thrombus, Superficial Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Hypertension-a Systematic Review.The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2021Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct acting oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of epidemiology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of the Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of the New Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drugs in R&D · 2019Pooled it
- Direct oral anticoagulant use in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with valvular heart disease: a systematic review.Clinical cardiology · 2017Pooled it
- Direct oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and heart valve surgery-a meta-analysis and systematic review.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseasePooled it
- Comparing the Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Bioprosthetic Valves: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis of randomized trials.Indian heart journalPooled it
- Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Transcatheter Pulmonary Valves: A Pediatric Institution's Experience.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement: An Umbrella Review.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Review
- Review
- A Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on the use of DOACs in Patients With Arterial and Venous Thrombosis.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2025Article
- Mechanical Aortic Valve Thrombosis During Anticoagulation Using Oral Rivaroxaban: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Review
- Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with bioprosthetic heart valves.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor shown to be an effective alternative to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the use of dabigatran in patients with bioprosthetic mitral and/or aortic valve replacement and AF.
methodsWe selected 34 and randomized 27 patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive dabigatran or warfarin. The primary endpoint was the presence of a new intracardiac thrombus at 90 days, by transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Secondary endpoints included the development of dense spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) and incidence of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), myocardium infarction, valve thrombosis and peripheral embolic events.
resultsThe trial was terminated prematurely because of low enrollment. There were 27 patients in total: 15 patients placed in the dabigatran group and 12 in the warfarin group. After 90 days, one patient (8.3 %) in the warfarin group and none in the dabigatran group had developed a new intracardiac thrombus. In the dabigatran group, two patients (13.3 %) developed dense SEC versus one patient (8.3 %) in the warfarin group. In the warfarin group, one patient (8.3 %) presented ischemic stroke, and none did in the dabigatran group. We observed no cases of hemorrhagic stroke, valve thrombosis, embolic events or myocardial infarction in either group throughout the study. However, one patient (6.7 %) in the dabigatran group had a fully recovered transient ischemic attack and one patient in the warfarin group died of heart failure.
conclusionsThe use of dabigatran appears to be similar to warfarin in preventing the formation of intracardiac thrombus.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01868243.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.