ArticleHealth research policy and systems2016
The 10 largest public and philanthropic funders of health research in the world: what they fund and how they distribute their funds.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The economic burden of malaria: a systematic review.Malaria journal · 2022Pooled it
- The impact generated by publicly and charity-funded research in the United Kingdom: a systematic literature review.Health research policy and systems · 2019Pooled it
- Ten Years ofSports healthPooled it
- Impact of early career medical research funding on subsequent publication outcomes and research income for female and male applicants in the United Kingdom.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Aligning incentives for open science in biomedical research: Navigating funder and institutional perspectives.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- Fifty years of maternal mortality research in sub-Saharan Africa: a bibliometric analysis of trends, gaps, and opportunities for health equity.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
- Exploring the landscape of lymphatic filariasis research in India: A scientometric analysis of two decades from 2000 to 2024.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Medical Imaging Data Strategies for Catalyzing AI Medical Device Innovation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Maximizing researcher-policymaker engagement in global public health.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Where You Train Matters: Surgeon-Scientists Disproportionately Trained at Highly Funded Institutions.Annals of surgery · 2025Article
- The second Trump administration: A policy analysis of challenges and opportunities for European health policymakers.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- The state of global palliative care research: a bibliometric study.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
- Two decades of research capacity strengthening and reciprocal learning on sexual and reproductive health in East Africa - a point of (no) return.Global health action · 2024Article
- Faster and farther towards the abyss: global health accelerators instead of tangible changes.Globalization and health · 2024Article
- Accounting for future populations in health research.Bioethics · 2024Article
- The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: transforming mental health implementation research.The lancet. Psychiatry · 2024Review
- Enhancing social value considerations in prioritising publicly funded biomedical research: the vital role of peer review.Journal of medical ethics · 2024Article
- Consideration of sex as a biological variable in diabetes research across twenty years.Biology of sex differences · 2024Article
- Clinical Trials for Special Populations: Children, Older Adults, and Rare Diseases.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2024Review
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about who the main public and philanthropic funders of health research are globally, what they fund and how they decide what gets funded. This study aims to identify the 10 largest public and philanthropic health research funding organizations in the world, to report on what they fund, and on how they distribute their funds.
methodsThe world's key health research funding organizations were identified through a search strategy aimed at identifying different types of funding organizations. Organizations were ranked by their reported total annual health research expenditures. For the 10 largest funding organizations, data were collected on (1) funding amounts allocated towards 20 health areas, and (2) schemes employed for distributing funding (intramural/extramural, project/'people'/organizational and targeted/untargeted funding). Data collection consisted of a review of reports and websites and interviews with representatives of funding organizations. Data collection was challenging; data were often not reported or reported using different classification systems.
resultsOverall, 55 key health research funding organizations were identified. The 10 largest funding organizations together funded research for $37.1 billion, constituting 40% of all public and philanthropic health research spending globally. The largest funder was the United States National Institutes of Health ($26.1 billion), followed by the European Commission ($3.7 billion), and the United Kingdom Medical Research Council ($1.3 billion). The largest philanthropic funder was the Wellcome Trust ($909.1 million), the largest funder of health research through official development assistance was USAID ($186.4 million), and the largest multilateral funder was the World Health Organization ($135.0 million). Funding distribution mechanisms and funding patterns varied substantially between the 10 largest funders.
conclusionsThere is a need for increased transparency about who the main funders of health research are globally, what they fund and how they decide on what gets funded, and for improving the evidence base for various funding models. Data on organizations' funding patterns and funding distribution mechanisms are often not available, and when they are, they are reported using different classification systems. To start increasing transparency in health research funding, we have established www.healthresearchfunders.org that lists health research funding organizations worldwide and their health research expenditures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.