Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26892506›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2016

Technology Use in Transition-Age Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Reality and Promises.

Evan Los, Jenae Ulrich, Ines Guttmann-Bauman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shared Care of Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Telemedicine Feasibility Study.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evan LosOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA lose@ohsu.edu.
Jenae UlrichOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Ines Guttmann-BaumanOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Youth with chronic illnesses have the greatest risk for a decline in their health management during transition-age. Because of this demonstrated and well-known issue, research has focused on how to improve the transition of care process. Despite the increasing number of technological devices on the market and the advances in telemedicine modalities available to patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), the utilization of technology is still suboptimal among patients of transition-age (ages 13-25). This article reviews the available resources, patterns of use in transition-age youth, and explores opportunities to advance technology use in transitioning patients with T1D from pediatric to adult care.

Indexed as

Transition to Adult CareAdolescentAdultBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansInsulin Infusion SystemsMaleSelf CareTelemedicineYoung Adultadolescencecontinuous glucose monitoremerging adulthoodinsulin pumptelemedicinetransitiontype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID26892506
PMCPMC5038542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.