Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26892442›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2016

Clinicopathologic and prognostic associations of KRAS and BRAF mutations in small intestinal adenocarcinoma.

Sun-Young Jun, Misung Kim, Mi Jin Gu, Young Kyung Bae, Hee-Kyung Chang, Eun Sun Jung, Kee-Taek Jang, Jihun Kim, Eunsil Yu, Dae Woon Eom and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Treatment of Ampullary Adenocarcinoma].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Prognostic implication of SOX2 expression in small intestinal adenocarcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of the external validity of the AJCC 8Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019
    Article
  18. RAS Mutation in Mucinous Carcinoma of the OvaryAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sun-Young JunDepartment of Pathology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Misung KimDepartment of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Mi Jin GuDepartment of Pathology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Young Kyung BaeDepartment of Pathology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hee-Kyung ChangDepartment of Pathology, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Eun Sun JungDepartment of Pathology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kee-Taek JangDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jihun KimDepartment of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eunsil YuDepartment of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dae Woon EomDepartment of Pathology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Mo HongDepartment of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8888-6007
Ulsan College · KRYeungnam University CollegeCatholic University of Korea · KRKosin University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activating KRAS and/or BRAF mutations have been identified as predictors of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. But the status of KRAS and BRAF mutations and their clinicopathologic and prognostic significance has not been extensively evaluated in small intestinal adenocarcinomas. In this work, the KRAS and BRAF genes in 190 surgically resected small intestinal adenocarcinoma cases were sequenced and their association with various clinicopathologic variables, including survival of the patients, was analyzed. KRAS or BRAF mutations were observed in 63 (33%) cases. Sixty-one cases had KRAS mutations and 2 had BRAF mutations and the two types of mutation were mutually exclusive. The majority of KRAS mutations were G>A transition (43/61 cases, 71%) or p.G12D (31/61 cases, 51%). The patients with mutant KRAS tended to have higher pT classifications (P=0.034) and more frequent pancreatic invasion (P=0.020) than those with wild-type KRAS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that certain mutated KRAS subtypes (G>A transitions and G12D mutations) were significantly correlated with higher pT classification (P=0.015 and 0.004, respectively) than wild-type KRAS and other KRAS mutations. The patients with KRAS or BRAF mutation had a tendency to shorter overall survival than those with wild-type KRAS and BRAF (P=0.148), but subgroup analysis demonstrated the patients with KRAS mutations showed worse survival (median, 46.0 months; P=0.046) than those with wild-type KRAS (85.4 months) in lower pT classification (pT1-pT3) group. In summary, KRAS and, infrequently, BRAF mutations are observed in a subset of small intestinal adenocarcinomas, and are associated with higher pT classification and more frequent pancreatic invasion. KRAS mutation is a poor prognostic predictor in patients with lower pT classification tumors. Anti-EGFR targeted therapy could be applied to about two-thirds of small intestinal adenocarcinoma patients, namely those with wild-type KRAS and BRAF if they have metastatic disease, similar to colorectal cancer patients.

Indexed as

Intestine, SmallAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm StagingPolymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID26892442
OpenAlexW2275522297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.