Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26892301›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2016

Stereological assessment of sexual dimorphism in the rat liver reveals differences in hepatocytes and Kupffer cells but not hepatic stellate cells.

Ricardo Marcos, Célia Lopes, Fernanda Malhão, Carla Correia-Gomes, Sónia Fonseca, Margarida Lima, Rolf Gebhardt, Eduardo Rocha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recipient-Donor Sex Constellation in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-An ELTR Study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Hallmarks of Aging in the Liver.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ricardo MarcosLaboratory of Histology and Embryology, Department of Microscopy, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, U.Porto - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Célia LopesLaboratory of Histology and Embryology, Department of Microscopy, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, U.Porto - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Fernanda MalhãoLaboratory of Histology and Embryology, Department of Microscopy, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, U.Porto - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Carla Correia-GomesScotland's Rural College, Epidemiology Research Unit - Future Farming Systems Group, Inverness, UK.
Sónia FonsecaLaboratory of Cytometry, Department of Hematology, UMIB - Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, CHP - Centro Hospitalar do Porto, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, HSA - Hospital de Santo António, U.Porto - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Margarida LimaLaboratory of Cytometry, Department of Hematology, UMIB - Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, CHP - Centro Hospitalar do Porto, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, HSA - Hospital de Santo António, U.Porto - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rolf GebhardtInstitute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Eduardo RochaLaboratory of Histology and Embryology, Department of Microscopy, ICBAS - Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, U.Porto - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTLeipzig University · DEScotland's Rural College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is long-standing evidence that male and female rat livers differ in enzyme activity. More recently, differences in gene expression profiling have also been found to exist; however, it is still unclear whether there is morphological expression of male/female differences in the normal liver. Such differences could help to explain features seen at the pathological level, such as the greater regenerative potential generally attributed to the female liver. In this paper, hepatocytes (HEP), Kupffer cells (KC) and hepatic stellate cells (HSC) of male and female rats were examined to investigate hypothesised differences in number, volume and spatial co-localisation of these cell types. Immunohistochemistry and design-based stereology were used to estimate total numbers, numbers per gram and mean cell volumes. The position of HSC within lobules (periportal vs. centrilobular) and their spatial proximity to KC was also assessed. In addition, flow cytometry was used to investigate the liver ploidy. In the case of HEP and KC, differences in the measured cell parameters were observed between male and female specimens; however, no such differences were detected for HSC. Female samples contained a higher number of HEP per gram, with more binucleate cells. The HEP nuclei were smaller in females, which was coincident with more abundant diploid particles in these animals. The female liver also had a greater number of KC per gram, with a lower percentage of KC in the vicinity of HSC compared with males. In this study, we document hitherto unknown morphological sexual dimorphism in the rat liver, namely in HEP and KC. These differences may account for the higher regenerative potential of the female liver and lend weight to the argument for considering the rat liver as a sexually dimorphic organ.

Indexed as

Hepatic Stellate CellsHepatocytesKupffer CellsSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleFlow CytometryLiverMaleRats, Wistardimorphismhepatic stellate cellshepatocytesKupffer cellsliverstereology

Identifiers

PMID26892301
PMCPMC5341582
OpenAlexW2239162692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.