ReviewWorld journal of urology2016
Standardization of definitions in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project.
Review in World journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Focal radiation therapies for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinical evidence and outcomes.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Functional outcomes and safety of focal therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review on results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Oncological results and cancer control definition in focal therapy for Prostate Cancer: a systematic review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Complications, oncological and functional outcomes of salvage treatment options following focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and a comprehensive narrative review.World journal of urology · 2019Pooled it
- Targeted microwave ablation of localised prostate cancer (VIOLETTE trial): a prospective multicentre study.BJU international · 2026Trial
- Predicting 1-Year Trifecta Outcomes After High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Cryoablation for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after targeted high-intensity focused ultrasound: a single-center study on feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- MRI performance to identify clinically significant prostate cancer following focal cryo-ablation.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Surveillance after Focal Therapy - a Comprehensive Review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
- Review
- Transperineal Focal Laser Ablation of the Prostate for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Cancers · 2025Review
- A Multi-Institutional Study of Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Nanoparticle-Directed Focal Therapy for Prostate Ablation.The Journal of urology · 2024Article
- Guidelines of guidelines: focal therapy for prostate cancer, is it time for consensus?BJU international · 2023Review
- Focal therapy for prostate cancer: what is really needed to move from investigational to valid therapeutic alternative?-a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Review
- Oncological and functional outcome after partial prostate HIFU ablation with Focal-OneProstate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2021Article
- Standardized Nomenclature and Surveillance Methodologies After Focal Therapy and Partial Gland Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Consensus.European urology · 2020Article
- Focal therapy, time to join the multi-disciplinary team discussion?Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
- Focal laser ablation as clinical treatment of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project.World journal of urology · 2019Article
- [Focal therapy for prostate cancer].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2019Review
- Analyzing the current practice patterns and views among urologists regarding focal therapy for prostate cancer.Urologic oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo reach standardized terminology in focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa).
methodsA four-stage modified Delphi consensus project was undertaken among a panel of international experts in the field of FT for PCa. Data on terminology in FT was collected from the panel by three rounds of online questionnaires. During a face-to-face meeting on June 21, 2015, attended by 38 experts, all data from the online rounds were reviewed and recommendations for definitions were formulated.
resultsConsensus was attained on 23 of 27 topics; Targeted FT was defined as a lesion-based treatment strategy, treating all identified significant cancer foci; FT was generically defined as an anatomy-based (zonal) treatment strategy. Treatment failure due to the ablative energy inadequately destroying treated tissue is defined as ablation failure. In targeting failure the energy is not adequately applied to the tumor spatially and selection failure occurs when a patient was wrongfully selected for FT. No definition of biochemical recurrence can be recommended based on the current data. Important definitions for outcome measures are potency (minimum IIEF-5 score of 21), incontinence (new need for pads or leakage) and deterioration in urinary function (increase in IPSS >5 points). No agreement on the best quality of life tool was established, but UCLA-EPIC and EORTC-QLQ-30 were most commonly supported by the experts. A complete overview of statements is presented in the text.
conclusionFocal therapy is an emerging field of PCa therapeutics. Standardization of definitions helps to create comparable research results and facilitate clear communication in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.