Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26892068›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2016

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE): what radiologist should know.

Federica Ciccarese, Domenico Attinà, Maurizio Zompatori

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Federica CiccareseRadiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, S.Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40100, Bologna, Italy. ciccarese.f@gmail.com.
Domenico AttinàRadiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, S.Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40100, Bologna, Italy.
Maurizio ZompatoriRadiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, S.Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40100, Bologna, Italy.
Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema is a relatively newly defined entity, which has been deeply studied in the recent years. Despite the wide numbers of papers on this topic, there are still several open questions about pathogenesis, epidemiology, natural history and prognosis. The diagnosis could be assessed only after HRCT scan as functional tests often result in an underestimation of this syndrome. What radiologists need to know about this syndrome consists in the heterogeneity of appearances: emphysema is mainly paraseptal and fibrotic pattern could be variable, including the variant of airspace enlargement with fibrosis which needs to be differentiated from honeycombing. A special attention must be paid on complications which could worsen the prognosis, such as pulmonary hypertension and lung cancer. Further studies are needed to address if the type of fibrotic pattern as well as fibrosis CT index could be considered as prognostic factors. Thus, the role of radiologists in the management of these patients is crucial as it involves diagnosis, detection of complications and could possible concerns the identification of patients at higher risk.

Indexed as

HumansPrognosisPulmonary EmphysemaPulmonary FibrosisRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCombined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysemaEmphysemaHigh-resolution computed tomographyIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID26892068
OpenAlexW2276748319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.