Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26892040›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2016

Vertebral fracture assessment by DXA is inferior to X-ray in clinical severe osteoporosis.

L Deleskog, N Ø Laursen, B R Nielsen, P Schwarz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Value and potential limitations of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) compared to conventional spine radiography: experience from a fracture liaison service (FLS) and a meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Management of osteoporosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Review
  4. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for osteoporosis screening in US postmenopausal women: is it cost-effective?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnosis of vertebral deformities on chest CT and DXA compared to routine lateral thoracic spine X-ray.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L DeleskogResearch Centre of Ageing and Osteoporosis, Department of Endocrinology PE, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
N Ø LaursenDepartment of Radiology, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
B R NielsenResearch Centre of Ageing and Osteoporosis, Department of Endocrinology PE, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
P SchwarzResearch Centre of Ageing and Osteoporosis, Department of Endocrinology PE, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Peter.schwarz@regionh.dk.
Rigshospitalet · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledSpine fractures are diagnosed by X-ray or vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning. The use of VFA evaluation by DXA is still debated. We demonstrate that VFA is inferior relative to X-ray in visualizing vertebrae properly in the upper spine and therefore with a reduced diagnostic performance in detecting fractures.

introductionVertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA has been evaluated for many years, and its use in clinical practice is still debated. In a cross-sectional setting, we aimed to compare VFA with traditional radiography in vertebral fracture (VF) diagnosis in severe osteoporotic patient.

methodsA total of 207 patients referred to the outpatient clinic for teriparatide treatment were screened, out of whom 35 (16.9 %) severe osteoporotic patients were identified (mean age 67.5 ± 11.3 years and median T-score -3.2 interquartile range (IQR) (-1.9 to -3.7). VF diagnosis was performed independently using VFA and X-ray in accordance with the semiquantitative (SQ) approach. The same technician performed the primary interpretation on both sets of images, after which a radiologist and an endocrinologist reviewed the evaluation for a conclusive judgement.

resultsIn total, 180 radiographic fractures were detected, corresponding to 5.1 fractures per individual. Using VFA, 18.5 % of vertebrae were considered unreadable, compared to 2.0 % on X-ray. The accuracy of VFA in VF detection using X-ray as a reference resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 75.5 and 86.7 %, respectively. Sensitivity decreased from the lumbar to thoracic level. Nevertheless, VFA only identified fractures consistently between Th11 and L3.

conclusionOur data, based on a severe osteoporotic population, demonstrate that VFA is inferior relative to X-ray in visualizing vertebrae properly in the upper spine, resulting in vertebrae not being assessable for analysis and a reduced diagnostic performance in detecting fractures. Improvements in DXA techniques are needed for it to be comparable with X-ray in VF diagnosis.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonRadiographyAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisSpinal FracturesX-RaysDual-energy X-ray absorptiometrySemiquantitative assessmentSevere osteoporosisVertebral fracture assessmentVertebral fractures

Identifiers

PMID26892040
OpenAlexW2278664743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.